Chinese Hepatolgy ›› 2020, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (9): 915-918.

• Liver Cancer • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Prognosis analysis of liver transplantation for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma using different criteria

ZHANG Da-li, ZHOU Xia, FENG Dan-ni, HE Xi, WANG Hong-bo, GAO Yin-jie, SUN Yan-ling, ZHANG Li-juan, LIU Zhen-wen, LIU Hong-ling   

  1. Liver Transplantation Center, the Fifth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100039, China
  • Received:2020-03-14 Online:2020-09-30 Published:2020-10-22
  • Contact: LIU Zhen-wen, Email:liuzhenwen@medmail.com.cn;LIU Hong-ling, Email:lhl7125@sina.com

Abstract: Objective To compare the prognosis of orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) under three different criteria in a cohort of cirrhotic patients with hepatocellular carcinoma ( HCC). Methods A total of 391 HCC patients with OLT were enrolled in this retrospective cohort study. They were received OLT under three different criteria, i.e., Milan, “Up-to-seven” and Hangzhou. Cox proportional hazard regression analysis, Kaplan analysis and log-rank test were performed to compare the patients' recurrent rates and outcomes after OLT. P value <0.05 was considered significant. Results Compared to the patients with OLT under Milan criteria, the OLT patients exceeded Milan but within “Up-to-seven” criteria has similar recurrence rate (13.8% vs 21.8%, P=0.17) and disease-free survival (DFS) (10.93±0.3 years vs 9.5±0.7 years, P=0.14), whereas the OLT patients who exceeded “Up-to-seven” but within Hangzhou criteria had significant difference in tumor recurrence (13.8% vs 33.8%, P<0.01), HCC-related death (4.9% vs 23%, P<0.01) and long-term survival (12.2±0.23years vs 9.1±0.79 years, P<0.01). Conclusion The overall survival (OS) and DFS after OLT in HCC patients who exceed Milan but within “Up-to-seven” criteria were excellent,thus they should be offered the option of OLT.

Key words: Liver transplantation, Hepatocellular carcinoma, Milan criteria, Prognosis