Chinese Hepatolgy ›› 2024, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (3): 303-307.

• Metabolic Associated Fatty Liver Disease • Previous Articles     Next Articles

The effect of obesity and hyperuricemia on liver steatosis and fibrosis in metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease

LIU Yun-xiao1, WANG Zhuan-guo2, XU Qiang2, DOU Jing2, WANG Xiao-bo2, GUO Yan2, GUO Feng2, WANG Xiao-zhong2   

  1. 1. Fourth Clinical Medical College of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi 830000, China;
    2. Traditional Chinese Medical Hospital Affiliated to Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi 830000, China
  • Received:2023-07-20 Online:2024-03-31 Published:2024-05-16
  • Contact: WANG Xiao-zhong, Email:wzx125@sina.com

Abstract: Objective To investigate the influence of obesity and hyperuricemia on steatosis and fibrosis in metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD). Methods A total of MAFLD 510 patients treated at the Department of Hepatology of the Traditional Chinese Medical Hospital Affiliated to Xinjiang Medical University between January 2020 and December 2022 were included in this study. After application of strict the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 402 patients were ultimately selected for analysis. Patients were divided into four groups based on their body mass index (BMI) and hyperuricemia status: non-obese without hyperuricemia group, non-obese hyperuricemia group, obese without hyperuricemia group and obese hyperuricemia group. Clinical parameters were compared across these groups, and liver steatosis and fibrosis were assessed using transient elastography Fibrotouch. Binary Logistic regression was utilized to evaluate the potential interaction between obesity and hyperuricemia in relation to hepatic steatosis and fibrosis. Results Of the 402 patients included in the study, distribution was as follows; 186 patients in the non-obese without hyperuricemia group, 34 patients in the non-obese with hyperuricemia group, 151 patients in the obese without hyperuricemia group, and 31 patients in the obese with hyperuricemia group. Statistically differences were observed in various demographic and clinical parameters among the groups, including age, sex, BMI, ALT, GGT, TG, Cr, UA, Alb, ALT/AST, D-D, FIB-4, BARD, LSM, CAP, drinking and smoking history (P<0.05). Evalution of liver steatosis and liver fibrosis stage based on the fat attenuation parameters and liver stiffness values revealed statistically significant differences among the groups (P<0.05). The proportion of moderate and severe steatosis (81.5%,83.9%, respectively) and progressive hepatic fibrosis (76.8%,87.1%, respectively) was significantly higher in the obese group compared to the non-obese groups. Binary Logistic regression analysis indicated that obesity was a risk factor for moderate-severe steatosis and progressive fibrosis in MAFLD patients. Moreover, the interaction between obesity and hyperuricemia demonstrated a multiplicative effect on the the likelihood of moderate-severe steatosis and progressive fibrosis (Obesity * hyperuricemia interaction term OR>1). Conclusion The findings of this study suggest a synergistic relationship between obesity and hyperuricemia in driving liver steatosis and fibrosis progression in MAFLD patients.

Key words: Obesity, Hyperuricemia, Metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease, Steatosis, Fibrosis