Chinese Hepatolgy ›› 2025, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (10): 1393-1397.

• Metabolic Associated Fatty Liver Disease • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Deep learning-based ultrasound models in the evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging-proton density fat fraction

GE Hai-long1, CHAO Chen1, SHI Xing-song1, BAI Cui-wei2, WANG Yu1, YIN Qi3   

  1. 1. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery Jintan Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University, Changzhou 213200, China;
    2. Department of Radiology Jintan Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University, Changzhou 213200, China;
    3. Department of Anesthesiology Jintan Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University, Changzhou 213200, China
  • Received:2024-09-25 Online:2025-10-31 Published:2025-12-16
  • Contact: YIN Qi,Email:525257061@qq.com;WANG Yu,Email:ywang030608@stu.suda.edu.cn

Abstract: Objective The use of Proton Density Fat Fraction (PDFF) in the diagnosis of fatty liver has been limited by its high cost and limited availability. This study aimed to develop a liver ultrasound model using deep learning for the evaluation of fatty liver severity and steatosis assessment based on PDFF. Methods Patients whose liver ultrasound and MRI-PDFF examinations were completed within one week in our hospital were included in the study. Two models were developed: 1) a regression model: quantifying the degree of liver steatosis, with continuous variable PDFF values as predictive data labels; 2) a classification model: classifiers were developed based on three threshold values of PDFF (5%, 10%, and 25%) to qualitatively diagnose and assess the severity of fatty liver. Results Predictions from the regression model based on three views (subcostal longitudinal, second liver portal, and hepatorenal interface) were correlated with actual PDFF values using Spearman correlation analysis. The results showed a close correlation between the predicted values and actual values (r values of 0.860, 0.922, and 0.903, respectively). Moreover, the average value of the three views correlated with the actual PDFF value with an r value of 0.961. The classification model based on the three views for binary classification using a PDFF 5% as the threshold showed significant performance (AUCs of 0.938, 0.946, and 0.959, respectively). The average value of the three views achieved an AUC of 0.970. As PDFF 10% as the threshold, the performance was also significant (AUCs of 0.974, 0.991, and 0.997), with the average achieving 0.998. As PDFF 25% as the threshold, the three AUCs remained significant (0.904, 0.958, and 0.936), with the average AUC being 0.992. Finally, to visualize the deep learning model in liver ultrasound prediction, we used Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping for visual interpretation of the convolutional neural network. Conclusion This study proposes deep learning-based ultrasound image classification and quantification models for fatty liver. These models have the potential to improve efficiency and reduce costs in the diagnosis and treatment of fatty liver, and shows significant clinical application prospects.

Key words: Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, Chemical-shift-encoded magnetic resonance imaging (CSE-MRI), Proton density fat fraction (PDFF), Ultrasound, Deep learning, Transfer learning