Chinese Hepatolgy ›› 2026, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (4): 545-548.

• Drug Induced Liver Injury • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Clinical characteristics of 84 cases of drug-induced liver injury caused by Chinese patent medicines

NIE Hong1, SONG Jie2, ZHANG Hui1, WANG Rui1, LOU Ting-ting1, WU Jian-jun1   

  1. 1. Department of Gastroenterology, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region People′s Hospital, Hohhot 010010, China;
    2. Department of Cadre Health Care Institute, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region People′s Hospital, Hohhot 010010, China
  • Received:2025-07-12 Online:2026-04-30 Published:2026-06-04
  • Contact: WU Jian-jun,Email:nmyywjj@163.com

Abstract: Objective To analyze the medication usage, laboratory test results, types of liver injury, and clinical outcomes in patients with drug-induced liver injury (DILI) caused by Chinese patent medicines, and to provide robust data support for safe clinical medication practices and pharmaceutical supervision. Methods Patients diagnosed with primarily or secondarily as “drug-induced liver injury” or “drug-induced hepatitis” between January 2022 and December 2024 were sellected. A total of 84 DILI cases caused by Chinese patent medicines were included, comprising 41 cases of hepatocellular injury type, 29 cases of cholestatic type, and 14 cases of mixed type. The suspected ingredients of the Chinese patent medicines and patient prognoses were analyzed. Clinical symptoms and biochemical parameters were compared across different clinical types of DILI. Results The most common suspected ingredients in Chinese patent medicines associated with DILI were Polygonum multiflorum (He Shou Wu) and its related preparations, tripterygium glycosides tablets, and Zhuanggu Guanjie Pills. Among the 84 cases, there were 41 cases of hepatocellular injury type, 29 cases of cholestatic type, and 14 cases of mixed type. The most common clinical symptoms included fatigue, loss of appetite, and jaundice. Comparisons showed no statistically significant differences in the main clinical symptoms among the three types of DILI (P>0.05). However, the incidence of pruritus was significantly higher in patients with cholestatic and mixed types than in those with hepatocellular injury type (P<0.05). Before treatment, ALT and AST levels were significantly higher in the hepatocellular and mixed types compared to the cholestatic type (P<0.05), while ALP and TBil levels were significantly elevated in the cholestatic and mixed types compared to the hepatocellular type (P<0.05). After treatment, liver function indices in all types significantly improved from baseline (P<0.05). All patients recovered and were discharged following the withdrawal of suspected causative agents and standard hepatoprotective therapy. No cases of liver failure or death occurred. Conclusion DILI caused by Chinese patent medicines primarily manifests as hepatocellular and cholestatic types. Clinical symptoms are often non-specific, and diagnosis relies on detailed medication history and dynamic monitoring of liver function indicators. With timely withdrawal of the offending drug and proper hepatoprotective treatment, patients generally have favorable outcomes.

Key words: Drug-induced liver injury, Chinese patent medicine, Hepatocellular injury type