肝脏 ›› 2017, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (12): 1103-1106.

• 论 著 • 上一篇    下一篇

血清PIVKA-Ⅱ在原发性肝癌诊断中的应用

秦亚楠,洪雷,宋正霞,丁芹   

  1. 221000 徐州医科大学附属医院感染性疾病科
  • 出版日期:2020-06-15 发布日期:2020-06-15
  • 通讯作者: 丁芹,Email: kgylan163@163.com

Clinical application of serum PIVKA-Ⅱ in diagnosis of primary liver cancer

QIN Ya-nan, HONG Lei, SONG Zheng-xia, DING Qin   

  1. Department of Infectious Diseases, Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou 221000, China
  • Online:2020-06-15 Published:2020-06-15
  • Contact: DING Qin, Email: kgylan163@163.com

摘要: 目的 探究血清PIVKA-Ⅱ对原发性肝癌的诊断价值。方法 2016年2月至11月就诊于徐州医科大学附属医院肝癌患者330例,采用 LUMI - PULSE G1200 全自动免疫分析仪检测患者血清PIVKA-Ⅱ和AFP水平,比较二者在原发性肝癌的诊断和预后监测中的作用。结果 血清PIVKA-Ⅱ检测原发性肝癌的敏感度(83.19%)高于血清AFP(66.37%,校正χ2=7.60,P=0.006),且两者联合检测的敏感度(89.38%)也高于血清AFP(校正χ2=16.05,P=0.00);血清PIVKA-Ⅱ与肿瘤体积呈正相关(r=0.63,P=0.00),且随着肿瘤直径增大而检测敏感度提高;血清PIVKA-Ⅱ在肝癌Ⅲ期和Ⅳ期分别高于Ⅰ期和Ⅱ期(Ⅲ期:U=151.00、173.00,P=0.00、0.04;Ⅳ期:U=238.50、292.50,P=0.00、0.02);原发性肝癌患者经手术或介入治疗后,血清PIVKA-Ⅱ下降幅度(80.13%)高于血清AFP(57.87%,χ2=4.226,P=0.04)。结论 血清PIVKA-Ⅱ检测原发性肝癌的敏感度和特异度均高于AFP,并且在原发性肝癌的预后亦具有较大意义,可作为临床上检测和评价原发性肝癌预后的肿瘤标志物。

关键词: 原发性肝癌, 异常凝血酶原, 甲胎蛋白

Abstract: Objective To investigate the clinical value of serum prothrombin induced by vitamin K absence-Ⅱ (PIVKA-Ⅱ) in diagnosis of primary liver cancer.Methods Peripheral venous blood serum was collected from 330 patients from February 2016 to November 2016 in our hospital. Serum PIVKA-Ⅱ and alpha-fetoproteins (AFP) levels were measured using LUMI-PULSE G1200 automated immunoassay analyzer, and further analyzed for evaluating their clinical value in diagnosing and monitoring primary liver cancer.Results Serum levels of both PIVKA-Ⅱ and AFP in primary liver cancer group were higher than those in chronic hepatitis group and liver cirrhosis group (PIVKA-Ⅱ:U=1016, 280.5, 582.5, P=0.00, 0.00, 0.00; AFP:U=3534, 1225, 2849,P=0.00, 0.00, 0.00). The sensitivity of serum PIVKA-Ⅱ (83.19%) and combination of PIVKA-Ⅱ and AFP (89.38%) was higher than serum AFP (66.37%, adjusted χ2=7.60, P=0.006, χ2=16.05, P=0.00) in diagnosing primary liver cancer, respectively. The serum level of PIVKA-Ⅱ was positively correlated with tumor volume (r=0.63, P=0.00), and the sensitivity of detection was positively correlated with tumor size. The serum level of PIVKA-Ⅱ was higher in stage Ⅲ and IV than that in stage I and Ⅱ, respectively (Ⅲ: U=151.00, 173.00, P= 0.00, 0.04; IV: U=238.50, 292.50, P=0.00, 0.02). The serum levels of PIVKA-Ⅱ and AFP had no significant correlation with tumor differentiation. The serum levels of PIVKA-Ⅱ and AFP were significantly increased in early primary liver cancer with portal vein thrombosis, intrahepatic metastasis and lymph node enlargement (U=134.00,183.00, P=0.00, 0.01). The levels of serum PIVKA-Ⅱ and AFP were significantly decreased in patients with primary liver cancer after operation or intervention therapy (Z= -5.08,-4.28, P=0.00, 0.00), and the level of serum PIVKA-Ⅱ (80.13%) decreased more than the level of AFP (57.87%, χ2=4.226, P=0.04).Conclusion PIVKA-Ⅱ detection had a higher sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing primary liver cancer than AFP, which could be used as a tumor marker for clinical detection and prediction of primary liver cancer prognosis.

Key words: Primary liver cancer, PIVKA-Ⅱ, AFP