肝脏 ›› 2016, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (10): 805-809.

• 论著 •    下一篇

FibroScan®实施受控衰减参数检测肝脂肪变的影响因素及应用价值分析

陈建能, 陈爱萍, 潘勤, 郭其裕, 沈峰, 郑瑞丹, 范建高   

  1. 363000 福建 漳州正兴医院肝病中心(陈建能,陈爱萍,郭其裕,郑瑞丹);上海交通大学医学院附属新华医院消化内科(潘勤,沈峰,范建高)
  • 收稿日期:2016-05-31 发布日期:2020-06-18
  • 通讯作者: 范建高,Email:fanjiangao@gmail.com;郑瑞丹,Email:zhengruidan@tom.com
  • 基金资助:
    中国肝炎防治基金会天晴肝病研究基金(TQGB2011018);福建省漳州市科技计划资助项目(Z04094)

Influential factors and clinical value of controlled attenuation parameters in the evaluation of hepatic steatosis using FibroScan®

CHEN Jian-neng, CHEN Ai-ping, PAN Qin, GUO Qi-yu, SHEN Feng, ZHENG Rui-dan, FAN Jian-gao   

  1. Research and TherapyCenter for Liver Disease, Zhangzhou-Zhengxing Hospital, Zhangzhou 363000, China
  • Received:2016-05-31 Published:2020-06-18
  • Contact: FAN Jian-gao, Email: fanjiangao@gmail.com; ZHENG Rui-dan, Email: zhengruidan@tom.com

摘要: 目的 探讨FibroScan®实施受控衰减参数(controlled attenuation parameter,CAP)无创定量检测肝脂肪变的影响因素及应用价值。方法 纳入非酒精性脂肪性肝病患者46例,慢性乙型肝炎并肝脂肪变患者31例。以肝活检为“金标准”评价肝脂肪含量,其中肝脂肪变分级S0:<5%;S1:5%~33%;S2:34%~66%;S3:>66%。使用FibroScan-502机型及M探头对所有研究对象进行CAP值测定。分析CAP值与肝脂肪含量、人体学指标及生化学指标的相关性。结果 肝脂肪变处于S0、S1、S2、S3的患者分别有12例、29例、31例、5例。CAP值随着肝脂肪变分级增加而增大,各级肝脂肪变患者CAP值差异具有统计学意义(χ2=36.990,P=0.000),相邻两级间CAP值差异均具有统计学意义(均P<0.05);Spearman相关分析表明,CAP值与体质指数(BMI)(r=0.368,P=0.001)、腰围(r=0.298,P=0.008)、肝脂肪变分级(r=0.696,P=0.000)呈正相关,与年龄(r=-0.335,P=0.003)呈负相关。当控制了肝脂肪变分级后,偏相关分析显示,CAP值仍与BMI(r=0.242,P=0.035)、腰围(r=0.243,P=0.034)呈正相关,与年龄(r=-0.142,P=0.222)的相关关系消失;多元逐步回归分析显示,仅肝脂肪变分级是肝脏CAP值的独立影响因素;受试者工作特征曲线分析发现,CAP诊断肝脂肪变程度≥5%、≥34%、≥67%的曲线下面积分别为0.891(P=0.000)、0.862(P=0.000)、0.889(P=0.004),最佳临界值分别为279、318、332 dB/m。结论 FibroScan®实施CAP无创定量检测肝脂肪变具有较好的应用价值,肝脂肪变分级是肝脏CAP值的独立影响因素。

关键词: 瞬时弹性记录仪, 受控衰减参数, 肝脂肪变, 影响因素

Abstract: Objective To investigate influential factors and clinical value of controlled attenuation parameters (CAP) in the measurement of hepatic steatosis using FibroScan®. Methods Forty six patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and 31 chronic hepatitis B patients with hepatic steatosis were enrolled in the study. Hepatic steatosis was graded by the liver lipids content pathologically: S0<5%, S1: 5%-33%, S2: 34%-66%, S3>66%. Measurement of CAP in all those cases carried out by FibroScan-502 and M probe, and its correlations with other factors, including hepatic steatosis grade, anthropometric parameters and biochemistry index, were also analyzed. Results Patients with hepatic steatosis were 12, 29, 31 and 5 in grade S0, S1, S2 and S3, respectively. The CAP value was positively correlated with hepatic steatosis grade, which was statistically significant different in each grade(χ2=36.990, P=0.000), as well as every adjacent two grades (P<0.05). Spearman correlation analysis showed that CAP value had a positive correlation with BMI(r=0.368, P=0.001), waist circumference (r=0.298, P=0.008) and hepatic steatosis grade (r=0.696, P=0.000), but a negative correlation with age (r=-0.335, P=0.003). Setting hepatic steatosis grades as control variables, partial correlation analysis revealed that CAP value was still positively correlated with BMI (r=0.242, P=0.035) and waist circumference (r=0.243, P=0.034), but showed no correlation with age (r=-0.142, P=0.222). Stepwise multiple regression analysis showed that hepatic steatosis grade was the only independent influential factor for CAP value.In addition, the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) overall were 0.891(P=0.000), 0.862(P=0.000), 0.889(P=0.004) for steatosis ≥ 5%, ≥ 34% and ≥ 67%, respectively, and the optimal cut-off values were 279, 318 and 332 dB/m, respectively. Conclusion CAP of FibroScan® had a satisfactory clinical value in quantitative evaluation of hepatic steatosis. Additionally, hepatic steatosis grade was an independent influencing factor for CAP value.

Key words: FibroScan®; Controlled attenuation parameters; Hepatic steatosis; Influential factors