肝脏 ›› 2020, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (8): 831-834.

• 肝癌 • 上一篇    下一篇

PTCD与ENBD置管灌注冷却液对肝癌微波消融胆管热损伤的预防价值

林涛, 高春燕, 李勇年, 赵世民   

  1. 710016 陕西 西安大兴医院消化内科
  • 收稿日期:2019-08-07 出版日期:2020-08-31 发布日期:2020-09-04

Preventive value of coolant perfusion via PTCD and ENBD catheter against bile duct thermal injury induced by microwave ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma

LIN Tao, GAO Chun-yun, LI Yong-nian, ZHAO Shi-min   

  1. Department of Gastroenterology, Xi'an Daxing Hospital, Shanxi 710001, China
  • Received:2019-08-07 Online:2020-08-31 Published:2020-09-04

摘要: 目的 研究经皮肝胆管穿刺引流术(PTCD)与经内镜鼻胆管引流术(ENBD)置管灌注冷却液对肝癌微波消融胆管热损伤的预防价值。方法 纳入我院收治的92例因肝门区肝癌行微波消融的患者为对象,按抽签随机方法分为两组,各46例,其中观察组经PTCD置管灌注冷却液行微波消融,对照组经ENBD置管灌注冷却液行微波消融。观察两组冷却操作结果,分析并发症发生情况及随访结果。结果 观察组微波消融时间显著长于对照组(P<0.05)。观察组并发症发生率为17.39%,明显低于对照组的43.48%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组随访期原位复发率、肝内复发率、死亡率及3年累积生存率分别为8.69%、41.30%、32.61%、67.39%,对照组分别为8.69%、36.96%、28.26%、71.74%,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 PTCD与ENBD置管灌注冷却液在肝门区肝癌微波消融中均有预防胆管热损伤作用,但前者安全性更好。

关键词: 经皮肝胆管穿刺引流术, 经内镜鼻胆管引流术, 肝癌, 微波消融, 胆管热损伤

Abstract: Objective To study on the preventive value of coolant perfusion via catheter systems of percutaneous transhepatic cholangial drainage (PTCD) and endoscopic nasobiliary drainage (ENBD) on bile duct thermal injury induced by microwave ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma. Methods Ninety-two patients with hepatocellular carcinoma in portal area underwent microwave ablation were randomly divided into two groups, with 46 cases in each group. The observation group was perfused with PTCD catheter, while the control group was perfused with ENBD catheter for microwave ablation of HCC. The cooling effects of operation and the incidences of complications during follow-up period of time in patients of these two groups were analyzed. Results The time of microwave ablation in the observation group was significantly longer than that in the control group (P<0.05). The incidence of complications in the observation group was 17.39%, which was significantly lower than 43.48% in the control group (P<0.05). The in-situ recurrence rate, intrahepatic recurrence rate, mortality rate and 3-year cumulative survival rate were 8.69%, 41.30%, 32.61%, 67.39% in the observation group, and 8.69%, 36.96%, 28.26%, 71.74% in the control group, respectively, without significant differences between these two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion Both coolant perfusion via PTCD and ENBD catheter systems can prevent bile duct thermal injury induced by microwave ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma in portal area, but coolant perfusion via PTCD catheter is better in safety.

Key words: Percutaneous transhepatic cholangial drainage, Endoscopic nasobiliary drainage, Hepatocellular carcinoma, Microwave ablation, Biliary duct thermal injury