肝脏 ›› 2020, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (8): 837-839.

• 肝癌 • 上一篇    下一篇

超声弹性成像检测弹性评分及应变率比值在肝结节性质鉴别中的应用

刘可, 黄妍卓   

  1. 400000 重庆市中医院超声科
  • 收稿日期:2019-10-15 出版日期:2020-08-31 发布日期:2020-09-04
  • 通讯作者: 黄妍卓,Email:huangyz52088@163.com

Elasticity score and strain rate ratio of ultrasound elastography in the identification of hepatic nodules

LIU Ke, HUANG Yan-zhuo   

  1. Department of Ultrasound, Chongqing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chongqing 400000, China
  • Received:2019-10-15 Online:2020-08-31 Published:2020-09-04
  • Contact: HUANG Yan-zhuo, Email: huangyz52088@163.com

摘要: 目的 探讨超声弹性成像(UE)检测弹性评分及应变率比值(SR)对肝结节性质的鉴别价值。方法 选取我院2017年7月—2019年7月收治的肝结节患者110例,均行UE检查。以病检结果为金标准,将其分成良性组、恶性组。比较两组UE评分、SR值,绘制受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)评估UE评分、SR值对良、恶性肝结节的鉴别价值,确定曲线下面积、最佳截断值与敏感度、特异度。经Kappa检验分析UE评分、SR值诊断与病检诊断的一致性。结果 在110例受检者中,良性67(60.91%)例,其中肝脓肿2(2.99%)例,肝血管瘤53(79.10%)例,肝血管内皮细胞瘤12(17.91%)例。恶性43(39.09%)例,其中肝细胞癌32(74.42%)例,转移性肝癌8(18.60%)例,胆管细胞癌3(6.98%)例。良性组恶性组UE评分分别为(1.63±0.12)分、(3.68±0.45)分,SR值分别为(3.09±1.12)、(10.62±3.75),良性组UE评分、SR值显著低于恶性组(P<0.05)。UE评分、SR值鉴别肝结节性质的AUC分别为0.802、0.788,二者联合鉴别的AUC为0.863。UE评分、SR值及二者联合诊断肝癌与病检结果一致性分别为0.667、0.532、0.811。结论 UE评分及SR值对肝结节性质鉴别有一定价值,必要时可将二者联合应用,提高准确率。

关键词: 肝结节, 超声弹性成像, 应变率, 弹性评分

Abstract: Objective To investigate the value of elasticity score and strain rate (SR) ratio of ultrasound elastography (UE) in differentiating hepatic nodules. Methods A total of 110 patients with hepatic nodules admitted to our hospital from July 2017 to July 2019 underwent UE. According to the pathology, the patients were divided into benign group and malignant group. The elasticity score and SR value were compared between the 2 groups. The receiver operator characteristic curve was drawn to evaluate the discrimination value of elasticity score and SR value between benign and malignant hepatic nodules. The area under the curve (AUC), the best cut-off value, sensitivity and specificity were determined. The kappa test was used to assess the diagnostic consistency of elasticity score and SR value with pathology. Results Among 110 patients, 67 (60.91%) were benign, including 2 (2.99%) cases of liver abscess, 53 (79.10%) cases of hepatic hemangioma and 12 (17.91%) cases of hepatic hemangioendothelioma. Forty-three (39.09%) cases were malignant, including 32 (74.42%) cases of primary hepatocellular carcinoma, 8 (18.60%) cases of metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma and 3 (6.98%) cases of cholangiocarcinoma. The elasticity scores of benign group and malignant group were (1.63 ± 0.12) and (3.68 ± 0.45), respectively. The SR values of benign group and malignant group were (3.09 ± 1.12) and (10.62 ± 3.75), respectively. The elasticity scores and SR values of benign group were significantly lower than those of malignant group (P<0.05). The AUC of elasticity score, SR value and combination were 0.802, 0.788 and 0.863, respectively. The kappa values of elasticity score, SR value and combination were 0.667, 0.532 and 0.811, respectively. Conclusion The elasticity score and SR value are valuable in the differential diagnosis of hepatic nodules. And the combined application has better accuracy.

Key words: Hepatic nodule, Ultrasound elastography, Strain rate, Elasticity score