肝脏 ›› 2023, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (5): 593-598.

• 其他肝病 • 上一篇    下一篇

CAR和CD4+/CD8+与传染性单核细胞增多症合并肝损伤患儿病情及其预后的相关性

丁忠丽, 崔蕾, 储开东   

  1. 226600 江苏 南通大学附属海安医院儿科
  • 收稿日期:2022-07-18 出版日期:2023-05-31 发布日期:2023-08-29
  • 通讯作者: 储开东,Email:276104417@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    2021年度中国管理科学研究院重点课题(KJCX11322)

Correlation of CAR and CD4+/CD8+ levels with disease severity and prognosis in children with infectious mononucleosis complicated with liver damage

DING Zhong-li, CUI Lei, CHU Kai-dong   

  1. Department of Pediatrics, Hai 'an Hospital, Nantong University,Jiangsu 226600,China
  • Received:2022-07-18 Online:2023-05-31 Published:2023-08-29
  • Contact: CHU Kai-dong,Email:276104417@qq.com

摘要: 目的 探讨C-反应蛋白(CRP)/白蛋白(Alb)比值(CAR)和CD4+ T细胞CD8+ T细胞比值(CD4+/CD8+)对传染性单核细胞增多症(IM)合并肝损伤患儿病情程度和预后评估的临床价值。方法 选择2020年7月—2022年3月南通大学附属海安医院收治的IM肝损伤患儿130例,根据肝功能检查是否异常分为肝损伤组(n=86)和非肝损伤组(n=34);将肝损伤组患儿按照肝损伤程度分成轻度肝损伤组(n=34)、中度肝损伤组(n=30)和重度肝损伤组(n=22),根据EBV DNA峰值载量分为低载量组(n=14)、中载量组(n=57)和高载量组(n=15)。选择同期在本院健康体检儿童50例,列入健康组。观察各组CAR和CD4+/CD8+表达水平,Pearson分析与TBA、IgM和APACHEⅡ评分的相关性,绘制受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)分析联合和单独检测的评估效能。结果 肝损伤组的CAR为0.83±0.21,高于非肝损伤组和健康组的0.62±0.14和0.35±0.09,肝损伤组的CD4+/CD8+为0.85±0.31,低于非肝损伤组和健康组的1.04±0.36和1.32±0.45,差异有统计学意义(F=24.387、19.482,均P<0.05)。观察组中,重度肝损伤组和高EBV DNA载量组的CAR为0.92±0.27和0.87±0.25,分别高于中度组和轻度组的0.84±0.22和0.71±0.16,以及中载量和低载量组的0.79±0.18和0.65±0.13;重度组和高载量组的CD4+/CD8+为0.89±0.31和0.78±0.29,低于中度组和轻度组的1.07±0.38和1.23±0.43,以及中载量和低载量组的1.13±0.42和1.25±0.51;差异有统计学意义(F=15.296、24.387、28.453、26.591,均P<0.05)。观察组急性期的CAR为0.83±0.21,高于康复期的0.54±0.13,急性期的CD4+/CD8+为1.06±0.37,低于康复期组1.28±0.42,差异有统计学意义(t=8.265,7.483,均P<0.05)。Pearson 显示,IM肝损伤患儿的CAR与TBA、IgM和APACHEⅡ评分呈正相关,CD4+/CD8+呈负相关(P<0.01)。ROC显示,CAR和CD4+/CD8+单独及联合检测评估IM肝损伤患儿的AUC分别为0.794、0.758和0.916,联合检测效能高于任一单项检测(P<0.01)。结论 血清CAR和CD4+/CD8+水平与IM肝损伤患儿的病情程度和疾病预后显著相关,联合检测的临床价值较高。

关键词: 传染性单核细胞增多症, 肝损伤, C-反应蛋白/白蛋白比值, CD4+/CD8+, 临床价值

Abstract: Objective To investigate the clinical value of C-reactive protein (CRP)/albumin (CAR) and CD4+T cell /CD8+ T cell ratio (CD4+/CD8+) in evaluating the severity and prognosis of infectious mononucleosis (IM) complicated with liver damage.Methods 130 children with IM liver injury from July 2020 to March 2022 were selected, and their liver function examination was abnormal. They were divided into liver injury group (n=86) and non-liver injury group (n=34). According to the degree of liver damage, the children in the liver damage group were divided into mild liver damage group (n=34), moderate liver damage group (n=30) and severe liver damage group (n=22), and according to the peak load of EBV-DNA, they were divided into low load group (n=14), moderate load group (n=57) and high load group (n=15). Fifty children who received physical examination in our hospital during the same period were included in the health group. The expression levels of CAR and CD4+/CD8+ in each group were observed. Pearson analysis was conducted for correlation with TBA, IgM and APACHE II scores. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was plotted to analyze the evaluation efficacy of combined and separate tests.Results CAR of liver injury group was 0.83±0.21, higher than 0.62±0.14 and 0.35±0.09, CD4+/CD8+ of liver injury group was 0.85±0.31, lower than 1.04±0.36 and 1.32±0.45, respectively. The difference was statistically significant (F=24.387, 19.482, both P<0.05). In the observation group, CAR was 0.92±0.27 and 0.87±0.25 in the severe liver injury group and the high EBV DNA load group, which were higher than 0.84±0.22 and 0.71±0.16 in the moderate and mild groups, and 0.79±0.18 and 0.65±0.13 in the moderate and low load groups, respectively. CD4+/CD8+ was 0.89±0.31 and 0.78±0.29 in the severe and high load groups, lower than 1.07±0.38 and 1.23±0.43 in the moderate and mild load groups, and 1.13±0.42 and 1.25±0.51 in the medium and low load groups. The differences were statistically significant (F=15.296, 24.387, 28.453, 26.591, all P<0.05). CAR in the observation group was 0.83±0.21 in acute phase, higher than 0.54±0.13 in rehabilitation phase, CD4+/CD8+ was 1.06±0.37 in acute phase, lower than 1.28±0.42 in rehabilitation phase, the difference was statistically significant (t=8.265, 7.483, all P<0.05). Pearson showed that CAR was positively correlated with TBA, IgM and APACHE II scores, while CD4+/CD8+ was negatively correlated (P<0.01). ROC showed that the AUC of CAR and CD4+/CD8+ tests alone and in combination were 0.794, 0.758 and 0.916, respectively, and the combined detection efficiency was higher than that of any single test (P<0.01).Conclusion Serum CAR and CD4+/CD8+ levels were significantly correlated with the severity and prognosis of patients with IM liver injury, and combined detection was of high clinical value.

Key words: IM, Liver damage, CAR, CD4+/CD8+, Assessed value