肝脏 ›› 2024, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (3): 273-277.

• 肝纤维化及肝硬化 • 上一篇    下一篇

肝硬化症状特征的潜在类别分析和影响因素

张淑华, 蒋萍梅, 蔡晓兰, 曹竹君, 钱珠萍   

  1. 200025 上海交通大学医学院附属瑞金医院护理部(张淑华,蒋萍梅,蔡晓兰, 钱珠萍),感染科(曹竹君)
  • 收稿日期:2023-11-19 出版日期:2024-03-31 发布日期:2024-05-16
  • 通讯作者: 钱珠萍, Email: gelico@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    上海市促进市级医院临床技能与临床创新三年行动计划(SHDC2022CRS002A);上海公共卫生三年行动计划(GWV-10.1-XK13);上海市临床重点专科(感染病学)(shslczdzk01103)

An analysis on the latent classification and influencing factors of the characteristic symptoms in liver cirrhotic patients

ZHANG Shu-hua1, JIANG Ping-mei1, CAI Xiao-lan1, CAO Zhu-jun2, QIAN Zhu-ping1   

  1. 1. Department of Nursing, Ruijin Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China;
    2. Department of Infection Disease, Ruijin Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China
  • Received:2023-11-19 Online:2024-03-31 Published:2024-05-16
  • Contact: QIAN Zhu-ping, Email: gelico@126.com

摘要: 目的 探讨不同肝硬化症状特征患者的人口学和疾病特征,及其分类的影响因素。方法 采用便利抽样法,选取2020年6月至2021年6月上海市瑞金医院感染科住院肝硬化患者220例,采用一般资料调查表、Memorial症状评估量表进行调查。对肝硬化症状特征进行潜在类别分析,logistic多元回归分析分类的影响因素。结果 肝硬化症状特征分为症状高发组144例(65.45%)和低疲乏-无肿胀组76例(34.55%)2个潜在类别;相较低疲乏-无肿胀组,症状高发组合并肝脏肿瘤(28.95%比45.83%)、低蛋白血症(56.58%比70.83%)和营养风险(39.47%比60.42%)的比例更高,中大量腹水(14.47%比34.02%)和Child-pugh分级B+C级(57.89%比69.44%)更高,日常生活活动能力(99.87%比96.88%)则较低(P<0.05)。合并肝脏肿瘤(OR=0.526,P<0.05)和腹水量增大(OR=1.612,P<0.01)是影响肝硬化症状分类的主要因素。结论 肝硬化症状特征存在异质性,可分为2个潜在类别,应加强关注合并肝脏肿瘤、肝功能严重损伤、低蛋白血症、营养状况不良和中大量腹水的患者。

关键词: 肝硬化, 症状, 潜在类别分析

Abstract: Objective To classify the symptomatic characteristics of patients with liver cirrhosis, and to explore the demographic differences and disease characteristics in patients with different symptomatic categories. Methods A total of 220 liver cirrhotic patients in the department of infectious disease of a tertiary hospital in Shanghai from June 2020 to June 2021 were selected as the research subjects by using convenient sampling method. The general information questionnaire and memorial symptom assessment scale were used for investigating the patients. Latent classification analysis were used to classify the liver cirrhotic patients according to their symptoms. Multivariate logistic regression was used to explore the differences in demographics and disease’ characteristics of patients with different categories. Results According to symptom characteristics, patients with liver cirrhosis were divided into 2 potential categories, "symptoms high incident group" (65.45%) and "low fatigue and non-bloated group" (34.55%). Compared with the "low fatigue and non-bloated group", there were higher rates of liver tumor (28.95%/45.83%), hypoproteinemia (56.58%/70.83%), nutritional risk (39.47%/60.42%), and higher levels of ascites volume (14.47%/34.02%) and Child-Pugh grade (B+C 57.89%/69.44%), and lower ability of daily living activities (99.87/96.88) in the "symptoms high incident group" (P<0.05). Complicated with liver tumors (OR=0.526, P<0.05) and increased volume of ascites (OR=1.612, P<0.01) were the main influencing factors associated with the classifications of symptomatic characteristics in liver cirrhotic patients. Conclusion The symptomatic characteristics of liver cirrhosis are heterogeneous and can be divided into 2 latent classes. More attention should be paid to the patients complicated with liver tumor, liver function damage, hypoproteinemia, malnutrition and larger volume of ascites. The symptoms should be managed through early recognition and precise intervention.

Key words: Liver cirrhosis, Characteristic symptoms, Classification