血清学指标联合Child-Pugh评分对肝硬化食管静脉曲张破裂出血患者EVL术后再出血的预测价值

肝脏 ›› 2024, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (8): 934-938.

血清学指标联合Child-Pugh评分对肝硬化食管静脉曲张破裂出血患者EVL术后再出血的预测价值

胡静, 易庭庄, 农欣蕾, 王统华

533000 广西百色右江民族医学院附属医院消化内科(胡静,王统华),肿瘤放疗科(易庭庄),消化内镜室(农欣蕾)

收稿日期:2023-08-28 出版日期:2024-08-31 发布日期:2024-09-30
通讯作者: 王统华,Email:wangtonghua420@163.com
基金资助:
广西自然科学基金项目(2020GXNSFAA297170)

Analysis of predictive value of serological indicators combined with Child-Pugh score on rebleeding after EVL in patients with liver cirrhosis complicated with esophageal varices bleeding

HU Jing¹, YI Ting-zhuang², NONG Xin-lei³, WANG Tong-hua¹

1. Department of Gastroenterology,Affiliated Hospital of Youjiang Ethnomedicine College, Baise,Guangxi 533000,China;
2. Department of Tumor Radiotherapy,Affiliated Hospital of Youjiang Ethnomedicine College, Baise,Guangxi 533000,China;
3. Department of Gastroenteroscopy,Affiliated Hospital of Youjiang Ethnomedicine College, Baise,Guangxi 533000,China

Received:2023-08-28 Online:2024-08-31 Published:2024-09-30
Contact: WANG Tong-hua,Email:wangtonghua420@163.com

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的分析血清学指标联合Child-Pugh评分对肝硬化食管静脉曲张破裂出血患者食管静脉曲张套扎术(EVL)术后再出血的预测价值。方法 2020年9月—2022年9月右江民族医学院附属医院收治的肝硬化EVB行EVL治疗的患者97例,根据患者EVL术后6个月内是否发生再出血分为再出血组(n=31)和非再出血组(n=66),收集患者临床资料,采用多因素logistic回归分析影响肝硬化EVB患者EVL术后再出血的相关因素,采用受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)及曲线下面积(AUC)分析血清学指标联合Child-Pugh评分对肝硬化EVB患者EVL术后再出血的预测价值。结果多因素logistic回归分析,结果显示,Child-Pugh分级(OR=2.259, 95%CI: 1.040～4.909)、门静脉内径(OR=2.933 95%CI: 1.509～5.700)、APTT(OR=1.451 95%CI: 1.158～1.817)、PT(OR=1.982 95%CI: 1.120～3.506)、Child-Pugh评分(OR=3.834 95%CI: 1.849～7.950)是影响肝硬化EVB患者EVL术后再出血的危险因素,PLT(OR=0.585 95%CI: 0.369～0.927)、Alb(OR=0.824 95%CI: 0.723～0.940)是影响肝硬化EVB患者EVL术后再出血的保护因素(P<0.05);ROC曲线结果显示,PLT、APTT、PT、Alb、Child-Pugh评分以及各指标联合预测肝硬化EVB患者EVL术后再出血的AUC分别为0.800、0.671、0.729、0.721、0.789和0.916,其敏感度分别为83.9%、64.5%、71.0%、77.4%、80.6%和87.1%,特异度分别为63.6%、68.2%、75.8%、66.7%、65.2%和74.2%。结论 Child-Pugh分级、门静脉内径、PLT、APTT、PT、Alb、Child-Pugh评分是肝硬化EVB患者EVL术后再出血的影响因素,血清学指标PLT、APTT、PT、Alb联合Child-Pugh评分有助于提升对肝硬化EVB患者EVL术后再出血的预测价值。

关键词: 血清学指标, 肝硬化, 食管静脉曲张破裂出血, 食管静脉曲张套扎术, 再出血, 预测价值

Abstract: Objective To analyze the predictive value of serological indicators combined with Child-Pugh score on rebleeding after esophageal variceal ligation (EVL) in patients with liver cirrhosis complicated with esophageal varices bleeding (EVB). Methods 97 patients with liver cirrhosis and EVB who received EVL treatment in our hospital between September 2020 and September 2022 were enrolled, and divided into rebleeding group (n=31) and non-rebleeding group (n=66) according to whether rebleeding occurred within 6 months after EVL. Clinical data of patients were collected. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the related factors affecting rebleeding after EVL in patients with liver cirrhosis and EVB, and the predictive value of serological indicators combined with Child-Pugh score on rebleeding after EVL in patients with liver cirrhosis and EVB was analyzed by receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) and area under the curve (AUC). Results Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that Child-Pugh grading (OR=2.259, 95%CI: 1.040-4.909), portal vein diameter (OR=2.933, 95%CI: 1.509-5.700), APTT (OR=1.451, 95%CI: 1.158-1.817), PT (OR=1.982, 95%CI: 1.120-3.506) and Child-Pugh score (OR=3.834, 95%CI: 1.849-7.950) were the risk factors of rebleeding after EVL in patients with liver cirrhosis and EVB, and PLT (OR=0.585, 95%CI: 0.369-0.927) and Alb (OR=0.824, 95%CI: 0.723-0.940) were the protective factors effecting rebleeding after EVL in patients with liver cirrhosis and EVB (P<0.05). The results of ROC showed that the AUCs of PLT, APTT, PT, Alb, Child-Pugh score and the combination of the above indicators in predicting rebleeding after EVL in patients with liver cirrhosis and EVB were 0.800, 0.671, 0.729, 0.721, 0.789 and 0.916 respectively, and the sensitivities were 83.9%, 64.5%, 71.0%, 77.4%, 80.6% and 87.1%, and the specificities were 63.6%, 68.2%, 75.8%, 66.7%, 65.2% and 74.2% respectively. Conclusion Child-Pugh grading, portal vein diameter, PLT, APTT, PT, Alb and Child-Pugh score are the influencing factors of rebleeding after EVL in patients with liver cirrhosis complicated with EVB. Serological indicators of PLT, APTT, PT and Alb combined with Child-Pugh score can help to enhance the predictive value on rebleeding after EVL in patients with liver cirrhosis complicated with EVB.

Key words: Serological indicators, Liver cirrhosis, Esophageal varices bleeding, Esophageal variceal ligation, Rebleeding, Predictive value

胡静, 易庭庄, 农欣蕾, 王统华. 血清学指标联合Child-Pugh评分对肝硬化食管静脉曲张破裂出血患者EVL术后再出血的预测价值[J]. 肝脏, 2024, 29(8): 934-938.

HU Jing, YI Ting-zhuang, NONG Xin-lei, WANG Tong-hua. Analysis of predictive value of serological indicators combined with Child-Pugh score on rebleeding after EVL in patients with liver cirrhosis complicated with esophageal varices bleeding[J]. Chinese Hepatolgy, 2024, 29(8): 934-938.

/ 推荐

参考文献 20

[1]	Jakab SS, Garcia-Tsao G. Evaluation and management of esophageal and gastric varices in patients with cirrhosis[J]. Clin Liver Dis,2020,24:335-350.
[2]	Fu S, Chen D, Zhang Z, et al. Predictive value of spectral computed tomography parameters in esophageal variceal rupture and bleeding in cirrhosis[J]. Turk J Gastroenterol,2023,34:339-345.
[3]	孙若楠. 食管胃底静脉曲张破裂出血预防和治疗进展[J]. 实用肝脏病杂志,2021,24:607-610.
[4]	Gralnek IM, Camus Duboc M, Garcia-Pagan JC, et al. Endoscopic diagnosis and management of esophagogastric variceal hemorrhage: european society of gastrointestinal endoscopy (ESGE) guideline[J]. Endoscopy,2022,54:1094-1120.
[5]	高慧茹, 高会斌, 彭昭, 等. 乙型肝炎肝硬化并发食管胃底静脉曲张破裂出血患者临床特征及影响因素分析[J]. 实用肝脏病杂志,2021,24:395-398.
[6]	Faisal MS, Singh T, Esfeh JM. Performance of elevated PT/INR as a risk factor for re-bleeding after band ligation in patients with acute variceal hemorrhage[J]. Dig Liver Dis,2020,52:1213-1214.
[7]	Lesmana CRA, Raharjo M, Gani RA. Managing liver cirrhotic complications: Overview of esophageal and gastric varices[J]. Clin Mol Hepatol,2020,26:444-460.
[8]	Tapper EB, Parikh ND. Diagnosis and management of cirrhosis and its complications: a review[J]. JAMA,2023,329:1589-1602.
[9]	Asghar S, Mustafa J, Rehman HU, et al. Predictors of re-bleeding after oesophageal variceal banding in cirrhotic patients at 4 weeks[J]. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad,2023,35:99-103.
[10]	Keung CY, Morgan A, Le ST, et al. Survival outcomes and predictors of mortality, re-bleeding and complications for acute severe variceal bleeding requiring balloon tamponade[J]. World J Hepatol,2022,14:1584-1597.
[11]	叶东, 张俊霞, 李洁, 等. 内镜下食管静脉曲张套扎术治疗乙型肝炎肝硬化并发食管胃底静脉曲张破裂出血患者再出血风险观察[J]. 实用肝脏病杂志,2021,24:879-882.
[12]	王艳玲, 韩军, 马雪梅, 等. 食管胃静脉曲张内镜下一级预防治疗对出血率的影响及其相关因素[J]. 中华肝脏病杂志,2022,30:407-412.
[13]	逯世林, 张娜, 王琳, 等. 抗凝血酶Ⅲ在乙型肝炎肝硬化失代偿期和并发食管胃底静脉曲张破裂出血中的评估价值[J]. 中华消化杂志,2022,42:770-776.
[14]	Gonzalo Bada N, Suárez Parga JM, Hernández Cabrero T, et al. Hemodynamic changes after endoscopic variceal ligation: a cohort study[J]. Rev Esp Enferm Dig,2020,112:456-461.
[15]	Luo R, Gao J, Gan W, et al. Clinical-radiomics nomogram for predicting esophagogastric variceal bleeding risk noninvasively in patients with cirrhosis[J]. World J Gastroenterol,2023,29:1076-1089.
[16]	江秋维, 黄理, 姚朝光. 乙型肝炎肝硬化并发食管胃底静脉曲张破裂出血患者临床特征及其危险因素分析[J]. 实用肝脏病杂志,2021,24:532-535.
[17]	Saleem K, Baig FA, Khan TU, et al. The predictors of re-bleeding in chronic liver disease patients after endoscopic variceal band ligation[J]. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad,2022,34:830-833.
[18]	Li S, Huang P, Jeyarajan AJ, et al. Assessment of non-invasive markers for the prediction of esophageal variceal hemorrhage[J]. Front Med (Lausanne),2021,8:770836.
[19]	Yang L, Sun R, Wei N, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of risk scores in prediction for the clinical outcomes in patients with acute variceal bleeding[J]. Ann Med,2021,53:1806-1815.
[20]	Hou Y, Yu H, Zhang Q, et al. Machine learning-based model for predicting the esophagogastric variceal bleeding risk in liver cirrhosis patients[J]. Diagn Pathol,2023,18:29-38.