肝脏 ›› 2024, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (11): 1358-1361.

• 肝癌 • 上一篇    下一篇

肝动脉灌注化疗联合信迪利单抗+贝伐珠单抗注射液对不可切除肝癌患者的临床疗效

程明亮, 陈俊霖, 刘小军, 孙邱, 陈姜   

  1. 636150 四川 宣汉县人民医院肿瘤科(程明亮),肝胆外科(陈姜); 636150 达州市中心医院介入医学科(陈俊霖);621000 绵阳市第三人民医院肿瘤科(刘小军);635100 大竹县人民医院介入科(孙邱)
  • 收稿日期:2024-08-30 出版日期:2024-11-30 发布日期:2025-01-10
  • 通讯作者: 陈俊霖,Email:13308245870@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    四川省医学(青年创新)科研课题(Q23066)

Clinical analysis of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy combined with cindilizumab and bevacizumab injection in patients with unresectable primary liver cancer

CHENG Ming-liang1, CHEN Jun-lin2, LIU Xiao-jun3, SUN Qiu4, CHEN Jiang5   

  1. 1. Department of Oncology, Xuanhan County People’s Hospital, Sichuan 636150, China;
    2. Department of Interventional Medicine, Dazhou Central Hospital, Sichuan 636150, China;
    3. Department of Oncology, Mianyang Third People’s Hospital, Sichuan 621000, China;
    4. Dazhu County People’s Hospital, Department of Interventional Medicine, Sichuan 635100, China;
    5. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, XuanHan County People’s Hospital, Sichuan 636150, China
  • Received:2024-08-30 Online:2024-11-30 Published:2025-01-10
  • Contact: CHEN Jun-lin,Email:13308245870@163.com

摘要: 目的 比较TACE、肝动脉灌注化疗(HAIC)联合信迪利单抗+贝伐珠单抗注射液治疗不可切除原发性肝癌(PLC)患者的临床疗效。方法 回顾性分析2019年1月—2023年6月收治不可切除PLC患者80例。依照治疗策略上的差异,将纳入病例分为TACE组、HAIC组,各40例,两组在TACE或HAIC基础上联用信迪利单抗+贝伐珠单抗注射液,比较两组短期疗效、肝生化指标、肿瘤标志物、T淋巴细胞亚群、不良反应及总体生存率的差异。结果 HAIC组客观缓解率(CR+PR/所有病例)、疾病控制率(CR+PR+SD/所有病例)为55.0%、82.5%,分别显著高于TACE组[35.0%、67.5%,P<0.05]。治疗后TACE组AFP、AFP-L3、ALT、AST及TBil分别为184.6(96.0,271.9)ng/mL、176.4(99.5,248.7)ng/mL、98(70,137)U/L、93(75,123)U/L及74.8(37.8,113.5)μmol/L,与HAIC组[86.4(60.3,123.6)ng/mL、226.2(110.8,301.2)ng/mL、56(32,80)U/L、50(35,71)U/L及41.8(25.6,79.8)μmol/L]比较,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗后HAIC组CD4+、CD4+/CD8+为38.5(35.0,39.8)%、1.3(1.2,1.4),与TACE组[35.2(34.0,36.8)%、1.2(1.0,1.2)]比,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。TACE、HAIC治疗后部分病例存在治疗相关的恶心呕吐、腹痛及低热等,在对症处理后好转缓解。两组随后在接受免疫治疗中发生发热7例、毛细血管增生症4例、贫血3例及甲状腺功能减退症2例。上述发生不良反应的病例均未施行后续免疫治疗。在治疗满1年后进行随访,其中TACE组、HAIC组分别失仿3例、1例,两者总体生存率64.9%(24/37)、41.0%(16/39),差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 采用HAIC治疗后继续联用信迪利单抗+贝伐珠单抗注射液治疗中晚期PLC患者短期疗效理想,在能保证用药安全的前提下,可显著改善总体生存情况,值得临床扩大样本进一步观察。

关键词: 原发性肝癌, 肝动脉灌注化疗, 经肝动脉栓塞化疗, 信迪利单抗, 贝伐珠单抗

Abstract: Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) in our hospital, hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) combined with cindilizumab and bevacizumab injection in the treatment of unresectable primary liver cancer (PLC). Methods Between January 2019 and June 2023 in our hospital, 80 patients with unresectable PLC were analyzed. According to the differences in treatment strategies, the included cases were divided into TACE group and HAIC group, with 40 cases in each group. The two groups were combined with cindilizumab and bevacizumab injection on the basis of TACE or HAIC, and the differences in short-term efficacy, liver function, tumor markers, T lymphocyte subsets, adverse reactions and overall survival rate were compared between the two groups. Results The objective remission rate (Complete Response (CR) + Partial Response (PR)/all cases) and disease control rate (CR + PR + Stable Disease (SD)/all cases) in HAIC group were 55.0% and 82.5%, which were significantly higher than those in TACE group [35.0% and 67.5%, P<0.05]. The alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), alpha-fetoprotein Lens culinaris agglutinin 3 (AFP-L3), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and total bilirubin (TBil) in TACE group were 184.6 (96.0, 271.9) ng/mL, 176.4 (99.5, 248.7) ng/mL, 98 (70, 137) U/L, 93 (75, 123) U/L and 74.8(37.8, 113.5) μmol/L, which had a significantly difference when comparing with HAIC group [86.4 (60.3, 123.6) ng/mL, 226.2 (110.8, 301.2) ng/mL, 56 (32, 80) U/L, 50 (35, 71) U/L and 41.8 (25.6, 301.2) μmol/L, P<0.05). After treatment, CD4+ and CD4+/CD8+ in HAIC group were 38.5(35.0, 39.8) % and 1.3(1.2, 1.4), which were statistically different from those in TACE group [35.2(34.0, 36.8) % and 1.2(1.0, 1.2)]. After TACE and HAIC treatment, some cases had treatment-related nausea and vomiting, abdominal pain and low fever, which were improved and relieved after symptomatic treatment. Seven cases of fever, four cases of capillary hyperplasia, three cases of anemia and two cases of hypothyroidism occurred in the two groups after receiving immunotherapy. None of the above cases with adverse reactions received follow-up immunotherapy. After 1 year of treatment, follow-up was conducted, with 3 cases lost to follow-up in the TACE group and 1 case lost to follow-up in the HAIC group. The overall survival rates were 64.9% (24/37) and 41.0% (16/39), with statistical significance (P<0.05). Conclusion After HAIC treatment, the combination of cindilizumab and bevacizumab injection in the treatment of advanced PLC patients has an ideal short-term effect. Under the premise of ensuring the safety of medication, the overall survival situation has improved significantly, which is worthy of a further observation by expanding clinical samples.

Key words: Primary liver cancer, Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy, Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization, Cindilizumab, Bevacizumab