肝脏 ›› 2024, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (11): 1368-1373.

• 肝癌 • 上一篇    下一篇

HIF-1、AFP-L3和sPD-L1对原发性肝癌患者病情和TACE联合索拉非尼疗效的评估价值

张永红, 沈预程, 陆滢滢, 陈国栋   

  1. 226600 江苏 海安市人民医院肿瘤科
  • 收稿日期:2023-09-21 出版日期:2024-11-30 发布日期:2025-01-10
  • 通讯作者: 张永红,Email:2268790761@qq.com

Evaluation value of HIF-1, AFP-L3 and sPD-L1 in patients with primary liver cancer and the efficacy of TACE combined with sorafenib

ZHANG Yong-hong, SHEN Yu-chneg, LU Ying-ying, CHEN Guo-dong   

  1. Department of Oncology, People's Hospital of Haian city, Jiangsu 226600,China
  • Received:2023-09-21 Online:2024-11-30 Published:2025-01-10
  • Contact: ZHANG Yong-hong,Email: 2268790761@qq.com

摘要: 目的 探讨缺氧诱导因子-1(HIF-1)、甲胎蛋白异质体3(AFP-L3)和可溶性程序性死亡配体1(sPD-L1)在原发性肝癌(PLC)患者行肝动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)联合索拉非尼治疗的评估价值。方法 选择海安市人民医院2021年1月—2023年3月行TACE联合索拉非尼治疗的112例PLC患者列入观察组,根据治疗前有无门静脉癌栓(PVTT)分为合并PVTT组(n=84例)和无PVTT组(n=28例),2个疗程后疗效评价结果分为稳定组(n=79例)和进展组(n=33例);选择同期来院健康体检者40例列入对照组。比较观察组是否合并PVTT亚组和健康组,稳定组和进展组治疗前后血清HIF-1、AFP-L3和sPD-L1水平;Pearson分析与Child-Pugh分级、术后碘油沉积比例和中位肿瘤进展时间(MTTP)的相关性,绘制ROC分析对病情和疗效的评估效能。结果 观察组合并PVTT亚组的HIF-1、AFP-L3和sPD-L1水平为(112.59±8.36)pg/mL、(19.53±3.46)%、(11.37±2.49)ng/mL,高于无PVTT亚组的(82.45±6.37)pg/mL、(14.67±2.29 )%、(6.09±1.73)ng/mL,健康体检组的(17.36±3.51)pg/mL、(2.18±0.54)%、(1.62±0.41)ng/mL,差异有统计学意义(t=24.725、27.647、41.529,均P<0.05)。稳定组治疗前的HIF-1、AFP-L3和sPD-L1水平为(76.42±5.83)pg/mL、(15.38±2.94)%和(6.23±1.79)ng/mL、,低于进展组的(120.65±8.74)pg/mL、(21.36±3.82)%和(9.86±2.31)ng/mL,差异有统计学意义(t=9.367、8.463、8.458,均P<0.05);治疗后稳定组的HIF-1、AFP-L3和sPD-L1为(37.59±4.68)pg/mL、(10.16±2.56)%和(4.37±0.86)μg/mL,低于进展组的(132.61±9.75)pg/mL、(23.29±4.31)%和(12.69±2.04)μg/mL,差异有统计学意义(t=14.725、12.165、13.027,均P<0.05)。Pearson分析显示,观察组的HIF-1、AFP-L3和sPD-L1水平与术前Child-pugh分级呈正相关,与术后碘油沉积和MTTP呈负相关(P<0.05);ROC曲线显示,HIF-1、AFP-L3和sPD-L1单项和联合检测评估PLC病情和疗效的AUC分别为0.782、0.829、0.736和 0.931,联合检测的敏感度和特异度高于任一单项检测效能(均P<0.05)。结论 HIF-1、AFP-L3和sPD-L1联合检测对PLC术前疾病程度以及TACE联合索拉非尼治疗效果评估的临床价值较高。

关键词: 原发性肝癌, 肝动脉化疗栓塞, 索拉非尼, 血清学指标

Abstract: Objective To investigate the evaluation value of hypoxia-inducible factor-1 (HIF-1), alpha-fetoprotein Lens culinaris agglutinin 3 (AFP-L3) and soluble programmed death ligand 1 (sPD-L1) in the treatment of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with sorafenib in patients with primary liver cancer (PLC). Methods A total of 112 PLC patients who received TACE combined with sorafenib were included in the observation group. According to the presence or absence of portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) before treatment, they were divided into the PVTT combined group (n=84 cases) and the PVTT free group (n=28 cases). And according to the results of the efficacy evaluation after 2 courses, they were divided into the stable group (n=79 cases) and the progressive group (n=33 cases). The control group was selected from 40 healthy subjects who came to our hospital during the same period. The serum levels of HIF-1, AFP-L3 and sPD-L1 were compared between the observation group and the healthy group, the stable group and the progressive group before and after treatment. Pearson analysis was applied to examine the correlation among the Child-pugh grade, proportion of iodol deposition after surgery, and median time to tumor progression (MTTP). The ROC curve was used to evaluate the efficacy of single and combined detection of HIF-1, AFP-L3, and sPD-L1 in assessing disease severity and treatment effect. Results The levels of HIF-1, AFP-L3 and sPD-L1 in the PVTT subgroup were (112.59±8.36) pg/mL, (19.53±3.46) % and (11.37±2.49) ng/mL. which were higher than (82.45±6.37) pg/mL, (14.67±2.29) %, (6.09±1.73) ng/mL in the PVTT subgroup and (17.36±3.51) pg/mL, (2.18±0.54) %, (1.62±0.41) ng/mL in the healthy group. The difference was statistically significant (t=24.725, 27.647, 41.529, all P<0.05). The levels of HIF-1, AFP-L3 and sPD-L1 in the stable group before treatment were (76.42±5.83) pg/mL, (15.38±2.94) % and (6.23±1.79) ng/mL. It was lower than (120.65±8.74) pg/mL, (21.36±3.82) % and (9.86±2.31) ng/mL in the progressive group, and the difference was statistically significant (t=9.367, 8.463, 8.458, all P<0.05). HIF-1, AFP-L3 and sPD-L1 in the stable group after treatment were (37.59±4.68) pg/mL, (10.16±2.56) % and (4.37±0.86) μg/mL. It was lower than (132.61±9.75) pg/mL, (23.29±4.31) % and (12.69±2.04) μg/mL in the progressive group, and the difference was statistically significant (t=14.725, 12.165, 13.027, all P<0.05). Pearson analysis showed that HIF-1, AFP-L3 and sPD-L1 levels in the observation group were positively correlated with preoperative Child-pugh grade, and negatively correlated with postoperative iodol deposition and MTTP (P<0.05). ROC curve showed that the AUC of HIF-1, AFP-L3 and sPD-L1 single and combined tests to evaluate the disease severity and efficacy of PLC were 0.782, 0.829, 0.736 and 0.931, respectively, and the sensitivity and specificity of the combination were higher than that of any single test (all P<0.05). Conclusion The combined detection of HIF-1, AFP-L3 and sPD-L1 has a high clinical value in the evaluation of PLC preoperative disease degree and the effect of TACE combined with sorafenib.

Key words: Primary liver cancer, Hepatic arterial chemoembolization, Sorafenib, Serological index