肝脏 ›› 2024, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (12): 1534-1537.

• 肝功能衰竭 • 上一篇    下一篇

HBV-ACLF患者合并细菌感染时早期使用人工肝支持治疗的临床研究

钟良辉, 周定英, 钟渊斌   

  1. 330006 江西 南昌大学第一附属医院感染性疾病诊疗中心
  • 收稿日期:2023-11-07 出版日期:2024-12-31 发布日期:2025-02-19
  • 通讯作者: 钟渊斌,Email: 71981232@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    北京肝胆相照公益基金会人工肝专项基金(iGandanF-1082022-RGG054)

Clinical study on the early application of artificial liver support therapy in HBV-ACLF patients with bacterial co-infection

ZHONG Liang-hui, ZHOU Ding-ying, ZHONG Yuan-bin   

  1. Department of Infectious Disease, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Jiangxi 330006, China
  • Received:2023-11-07 Online:2024-12-31 Published:2025-02-19
  • Contact: ZHONG Yuan-bin, Email:71981232@qq.com

摘要: 目的 分析乙型肝炎病毒相关慢加急性肝衰竭(HBV-ACLF)患者合并细菌感染时早期应用人工肝支持治疗对抗生素抗感染效果及肝功能的影响。方法 选取2019年1月—2022年12月南昌大学第一附属医院收治的HBV-ACLF合并细菌感染的患者为研究对象,以在明确存在感染3 d内在使用抗生素的基础上是否行人工肝支持治疗进行分组,其中3 d内予以人工肝治疗为治疗组(n=44)和3 d内未予以人工肝治疗为对照组(n=39)。比较两组在人工肝治疗前后的降钙素原(PCT)、总胆红素(TBil)、凝血酶原时间(PT)、国际标准化比值(INR),以及感染控制(PCT降至80%或0.5 ng/mL以下)所用天数。结果 两组患者人工肝治疗前后PCT降幅差异无统计学意义[治疗组:(0.42±0.32)ng/mL,对照组:(0.50±0.30)ng/mL,P>0.05],治疗组TBil治疗前后降幅显著高于对照组[治疗组:(233.63±107.04)μmol/L,对照组:(164.21±104.47)μmol/L,P<0.01],治疗组感染控制所用天数显著少于对照组[治疗组:(5.13±2.40)d,对照组:(9.00±7.17)d,P<0.01]。两组患者在人工肝治疗后较治疗前PT、INR差异无统计学意义。结论 对于HBV-ACLF合并细菌感染的患者,在明确存在感染3 d内抗生素联合人工肝支持治疗,PCT较治疗前可得到下降。在感染早期应用人工肝治疗不影响抗生素的抗感染效果,也不会加重感染的程度,而且可以缩短抗生素使用时间,更有利于有效控制感染。并且早期应用人工肝支持治疗可以有效遏制肝衰竭的进展,更有效地降低胆红素,有利于肝功能的恢复。

关键词: 乙型肝炎病毒, 慢加急性肝衰竭, 感染, 人工肝

Abstract: Objective To evaluate whether the early application of artificial liver support therapy, combined with antibiotic treatment, enhances the anti-infective efficacy of antibiotics and promotes liver function recovery in patients with hepatitis B virus-associated acute-on-chronic liver failure (HBV-ACLF) complicated by bacterial co-infection.Methods This study included patients with HBV-ACLF and bacterial co-infection admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University between January 2019 and December 2022. Patientes were divided into two groups based on whether they received artificial liver support therapy(DPMAS+PE) within three days of confirmed infection alongside antibiotic treatment. The treatment group (n=44) received artificial liver support within three days, while the control group (n=39) did not. Key indicators, including procalcitonin (PCT), total bilirubin (TBil), prothrombin time (PT), international normalized ratio (INR), and infection control time(defined as PCT reduction to ≤80% of baseline or < 0.5 ng/mL), were compared between the two groups before and after artificial liver treatment.Results No statistically significant difference was observed in the reduction of PCT before and after artificial liver treatment between the two groups (treatment group: 0.42±0.32 ng/mL, control group: 0.50±0.30 ng/mL, P>0.05). However, the reduction in TBil was significantly greater in the treatment group compared to the control group (treatment group: 233.63±107.04 μmol/L, control group: 164.21±104.47 μmol/L, P<0.01). The treatment group also required fewer days for infection control than the control group (treatment group: 5.13±2.40 days, control group: 9.00±7.17 days, P<0.01). There was no significant difference in PT or INR between the two groups after treatment compared to baseline.Conclusion In patients with HBV-ACLF and bacterial co-infection, the combination of antibiotics and early artificial liver support therapy (within 3 days of confirmed infection) leads to a significant reduction in PCT levels compared to baselinet. Early application of artificial liver therapy does not interfere with the the anti-infective efficacy of antibiotics or exacerbate the infection, and it helps recude the duration of antibiotic use, thereby facilitating more effective infection control. Additionally, early artificial liver support effectively limits the progression of liver failure, significantly reduces bilirubin levels, and promotes liver function recovery.

Key words: Hepatitis B virus, Acute-on-chronic liver failure, Infections, Artificial liver support