肝脏 ›› 2024, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (12): 1541-1544.

• 药物性肝损伤 • 上一篇    下一篇

双重血浆分子吸附系统治疗药物性肝损伤伴高胆红素血症患者的临床观察

石宏, 何剑成, 王俊杰, 杨力   

  1. 628400 四川 苍溪县人民医院重症医学科(石宏,杨力),肾病科(王俊杰); 628000 广元市第一人民医院重症医学科(何剑成)
  • 收稿日期:2024-06-26 出版日期:2024-12-31 发布日期:2025-02-19
  • 基金资助:
    四川省科技计划基金资助项目(2020YFS0122)

Clinical evaluation of the dual plasma molecular adsorption system in the treatment of drug-induced liver injury with hyperbilirubinemia

SHI Hong1, HE Jian-cheng2, WANG Jun-jie3, YANG li1   

  1. 1. Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Cangxi County People's Hospital, Sichuan 628400, China;
    2. Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Guangyuan First People's Hospital, Sichuan 628000, China;
    3. Nephrology Department of Cangxi County People's Hospital, Sichuan 628400,China
  • Received:2024-06-26 Online:2024-12-31 Published:2025-02-19

摘要: 目的 分析DPMAS治疗DILI伴高胆红素血症疗效,以冀丰富该少见病例的临床诊疗资料。方法 收集DILI伴高胆红素血症患者95例,基于施行方案的差异分为观察(PE+DPMAS)、对照组(PE),并从不同组别、不同治疗阶段(治疗前后)在临床指标及其变化率等方面予以全面比较。结果 在临床指标本身数值方面,治疗后观察组ALT、AST、TBA、TBil及DBil为56(35,70)U/L、49(30,73)U/L、59.4(43.2,70.2)μmol/L、102.7(69.4,148.7)μmol/L及84.5(56.8,128.7)μmol/L,均较对照组改善显著[77(50,102)U/L、71(52,97)U/L、78.5(56.2,84.7)μmol/L、145.9(92.3,206.5)μmol/L及122.4(78.9,154.0)μmol/L,P<0.05]。在临床指标变化率方面,治疗后观察组TBA、TBil和DBil下降率显著高于对照组(P<0.05)。在围治疗阶段炎症指标方面,观察组治疗后TNF-α、IL-6及hs-CRP为21.6(17.5,28.0)pg/mL、20.6(17.3,24.8)pg/mL、14.5(12.6,17.2)mg/L,均显著低于对照组[32.3(25.8,41.4)pg/mL、26.7(20.9,28.9)pg/mL、19.3(14.3,19.5)mg/L,P<0.05]。治疗结束,两组共出现消化道出血1例、腹腔感染5例以及电解质紊乱6例,两组并发症发生率无明显差异(P>0.05),需要重点记录的是其中1例消化道出血、2例腹腔感染未控制良好进展为重症感染的患者因病情需要进入ICU继续治疗,后病情稳定后出院。结论 DPMAS治疗DILI伴严重高胆红素血症临床疗效显著。

关键词: 药物性肝损伤, 高胆红素血症, 双重血浆分子吸附系统

Abstract: Objective To evaluate the therapeutic effect of the Dual Plasma Molecular Adsorption System(DPMAS) on drug-induced liver injury(DILI) with hyperbilirubinemia, aiming to enrich the clinical data on the diagnosis and treatment of this rare condition.Methods A total of 95 cases of DILI with hyperbilirubinemia were collected and divided into two groups: the observation group (PE+DPMAS) and the control group (PE), based on the treatment protocol. The clinical indices and their change rates were compared between the groups and across different treatment stages (pre-treatment and post-treatment).Results In terms of clinical indicators, after treatment at our center, the observation group showed significant improvements in ALT, AST, TBA, TBil and DBil, with values of 56 (35, 70) U/L, 49 (30, 73) U/L, 59.4 (43.2, 70.2) μmol/L and 102.7 (69.4, 148.7) μmol/L,and 84.5(56.8,128.7)μmol/L, respectively. In comparison, the control group had higher values:, 77 (50, 102) U/L, 71 (52, 97) U/L, 78.5 (56.2, 84.7) μmol/L, 145.9 (92.3, 206.5) μmol/L and 122.4 (78.9, 154.0) μmol/L, P<0.05. Regarding the change rate of clinical indicators, the decrease in TBA, TBil and DBil was significantly greater in the observation group than in the control group (P<0.05). For inflammatory markers, after treatment, the observation group had significantly lower levels of TNF-α, IL-6 and hs-CRP, with values of 21.6(17.5, 28.0) pg/mL, 20.6(17.3, 24.8) pg/mL and 14.5(12.6, 17.2) mg/L, respectively. These values were significantly lower than those in the control group: 32.3(25.8, 41.4) pg/mL, 26.7(20.9, 28.9) pg/mL, and 19.3(14.3, 19.5) mg/L, P<0.05]. Regarding treatment-related complications, at the end of the study, there were 1 case of gastrointestinal bleeding, 5 cases of abdominal infection, and 6 cases of electrolyte disturbance in both groups. There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between the two groups (P>0.05). Notably, one case of gastrointestinal bleeding and two cases of abdominal infection, which were not well-controlled and progressed to severe infection, required ICU care and were later discharged after stabilization.Conclusion DPMAS is effective in treating DILI with severe hyperbilirubinemia.

Key words: Drug-induced liver injury, Hyperbilirubinemia, Dual plasma molecular adsorption system