肝脏 ›› 2025, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (4): 505-508.

• 肝纤维化及肝硬化 • 上一篇    下一篇

乙型肝炎肝硬化和酒精性肝硬化的鉴别诊断预测模型构建

李扬, 朱莉, 李晋, 朱传武, 谭欣雨, 陈彩林, 陈日钗, 李明   

  1. 215131 江苏 苏州大学苏州医学院附属传染病医院(苏州市第五人民医院)(李扬,朱莉,李晋,朱传武,谭欣雨,李明); 南京医科大学附属江苏盛泽医院(陈彩林); 树兰(杭州)医院(陈日钗)
  • 收稿日期:2024-09-25 出版日期:2025-04-30 发布日期:2025-06-17
  • 通讯作者: 李明,Email:llttyy97@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(81902054);江苏省社会发展面上项目(BE2022734);苏州市科技计划项目(SS2019075,LCZX202117,SKY2022061,SKY2023221)

Construction of the predictive model for differential diagnosis of hepatitis B cirrhosis and alcoholic cirrhosis

LI Yang1, ZHU Li1, LI Jin1, ZHU Chuan-wu1, TAN Xin-yu1, CHEN Cai-lin2, CHEN Ri-chai3, LI Ming1   

  1. 1. The Affiliated Infectious Disease Hospital of Suzhou Medical College, Soochow University (Suzhou Fifth People's Hospital), Jiangsu 215131, China;
    2. Shulan (Hangzhou) Hospital, Zhejiang 310015, China;
    3. Jiangsu Shengze Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Suzhou 215228, China
  • Received:2024-09-25 Online:2025-04-30 Published:2025-06-17
  • Contact: LI Ming, Email: llttyy97@163.com

摘要: 目的 构建乙型肝炎肝硬化(hepatitis B-related cirrhosis,HBC)和酒精性肝硬化(alcoholic cirrhosis,AC)鉴别诊断的预测模型。方法 采集2021年1月至2024年5月在苏州市第五人民医院和树兰(杭州)医院就诊的70例HBC患者及57例AC患者的血常规、肝生化、细胞因子及免疫细胞比例等指标。采用二元logistic回归分析方法构建联合预测模型,预测公式为logit (P)=0.09+0.01*GGT-0.075*IL-17。结果 两组患者的血清ALT、AST、Alb、ALP、PLT和CRP差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),而AC组TBil、DBil、GGT和PT显著高于HBC组,差异有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。HBC组红细胞计数显著高于AC组(P=0.0391),其他血常规指标在两组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。IL-2和IFN-γ在两组间无显著差异表达,HBC组IL-4、IL-17、和TNF-α显著高于AC组,而IL-6和IL-10的表达水平低于AC组(均P<0.05)。ROC曲线表明,TBil、DBil、GGT、PT、IL-4和IL-6鉴别诊断HBC和AC的曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.614、0.642、0.686、0.631、0.676、0.641,预测诊断能力较低(0.5<AUC<0.7),IL-17的AUC为0.735,对HBC和AC的鉴别诊断能力一般。该预测模型能够显著提高对HBC和AC的鉴别诊断能力,AUC为0.836,敏感度为84.2%,特异度为71.4%,cutoff值为-0.085,即0.01*GGT-0.075*IL-17≥-0.265,诊断为AC的准确率为83.6%。结论 联合GGT和IL-17构建的预测模型有助于鉴别HBC和AC。

关键词: 乙型肝炎肝硬化, 酒精性肝硬化, γ-谷氨酰转肽酶, 白细胞介素-17, 联合预测模型

Abstract: Objective To explore the difference in routine test indicators and specific cytokine profiles between hepatitis B-related cirrhosis (HBC) and alcoholic cirrhosis (AC) and provide a basis for differential diagnosis and optimized treatment. Methods We collected data from 70 HBC patients and 57 AC patients who were treated at Suzhou Fifth People's Hospital and Shulan (Hangzhou) Hospital between January 2021 and May 2024. Data on complete blood count, liver biochemical parameters, cytokine levels, and immune cell ratios were collected and analyzed using GraphPad and SPSS. Results No significant difference was found between the two groups in serum levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), albumin (ALB), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), platelet (PLT), and C-reactive protein (CRP) (P>0.05). However, total Bilirubin (TB, P=0.0083), direct bilirubin (DB, P=0.0014), gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT, P<0.0001), and prothrombin time (PT, P=0.0050) were significantly higher in the AC group compared to the HBC group. The red blood cell count (P=0.0391) was significantly higher in the HBC group than in the AC group, while other blood routine indicators showed no significant differences between the two groups. Interleukin-2 (IL-2) and Interferon-γ (IFN-γ) levels were not significantly different between the groups, whereas IL-4 (P=0.0007), IL-17 (P<0.0001), and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α, P=0.0114) were significantly higher in the HBC group, and IL-6 (P=0.0049) and IL-10 (P=0.0267) were significantly higher in the AC group. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis indicated that TB (0.614), DB (0.642), GGT (0.686), PT (0.631), IL-4 (0.676), and IL-6 (0.641) had low predictive diagnostic ability (0.5 < AUC < 0.7) between the two groups, while IL-17 (0.735) had moderate discriminatory ability (0.7 < AUC < 0.85). A binary logistic regression analysis was used to construct a combined predictive model, revealing that combining GGT and IL-17 yielded the optimal predictive model. The prediction formula was logit(P)=0.09+0.01*GGT-0.075*IL-17. This model significantly improved the ability to differentiate between HBC and AC, with a prediction accuracy of 83.6%, sensitivity of 84.2%, specificity of 71.4%, and a cutoff value of -0.085. When 0.01*GGT - 0.075*IL-17 ≥ -0.265, the diagnostic accuracy for AC was 83.6%. Conclusion By analyzing the differences in routine clinical indicators and cytokine expression between the HBC and AC groups, we found significant differences in liver biochemical indicators and cytokines such as IL-17. Further results indicate that the a predictive model combining GGT and IL-17 significantly improves the ability to differentiate between HBC and AC. In summary, the predictive model established using binary logistic regression analysis aids in distinguishing between HBC and AC, which provides a reference for the early diagnosis and optimized treatment of both types of cirrhosis.

Key words: Hepatitis B-related cirrhosis, Alcoholic cirrhosis, GGT, IL-17, Combined predictive model