肝脏 ›› 2025, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (4): 532-536.

• 其他肝病 • 上一篇    下一篇

慢加急性肝衰竭患者90 d预后模型的构建

许景, 杨永峰   

  1. 211166 江苏 南京医科大学公共卫生学院(许景); 南京医科大学公共卫生学院教学医院(南京市第二医院)肝病科(杨永峰)
  • 收稿日期:2024-11-20 出版日期:2025-04-30 发布日期:2025-06-17
  • 通讯作者: 杨永峰,Email: yyf1997@163.com

Construction of a 90-day prognostic model with acute-on-chronic liver failure

XU Jing1, YANG Yong-feng2   

  1. 1. Nanjing Medical University School of Public Health, Jiangsu 211166, China;
    2. Department of Hepatology, Teaching Hospital, Nanjing Medical University School of Public Health (Nanjing Second Hospital), Jiangsu 210003, China
  • Received:2024-11-20 Online:2025-04-30 Published:2025-06-17
  • Contact: YANG Yong-feng, Email: yyf1997@163.com

摘要: 目的 探讨慢加急性肝衰竭(ACLF)预后的影响因素并构建预测模型。方法 纳入2016年6月至2019年12月南京市第二医院收治的ACLF患者190例。随访90 d,根据预后情况将其分为死亡组89例和生存组101例。采用logistic 回归分析ACLF患者90 d预后的影响因素,构建预后模型。绘制ROC曲线评估模型的预测效能。结果 多因素 logistic 回归分析结果显示,ACLF患者90 d预后的影响因素分别是年龄(OR=1.045,P=0.007)、肝性脑病(HE)(OR=4. 341,P<0.001)、凝血酶原时间(PT)(OR=1.241,P=0.001)、凝血酶原活动度(PTA)(OR=1.097,P=0.009)和国际标准化比值(INA)(OR=0.532,P=0.027)。模型方程为:NEWM=-72.662+0.044×年龄+0.216×PT+0.093×PTA-0.631×INR+1.468×HE。ROC曲线分析表明:该模型的AUC为0.81(95% CI: 0. 74 ~ 0.87)明显高于MELD评分0.67(95% CI: 0.59 ~ 0.74)、MELD-Na评分0.65(95% CI: 0. 57 ~ 0.73)、iMELD评分0.70(95% CI: 0. 62 ~ 0.77)和MESO评分0.66(95% CI: 0. 58 ~ 0.74),NEWM评分对ACLF患者90 d生存情况的预测能力明显优于其他评分。结论 与MELD系列评分相比,NEWM对ACLF 患者预后判断效能最佳。

关键词: 慢加急性肝衰竭, 预后模型, 危险因素

Abstract: Objective To investigate the prognostic factors and prognosis mode in acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF). Methods A retrospective study was conducted and included clinical data from 190 patients diagnosed with ACLF between June 2016 and December 2019. Patients were followed up for 90 days and were stratified by prognosis into 89 cases (44.5%) in the death group and 101 cases (50.5%) in the survival group. Logistic regression was used to investigate the prognostic factors influencing the 90-day prognosis of ACLF patients and to construct a new prognostic model. The predictive performance of the model was assessed by plotting the ROC curve. Results The results of multivariate logistic regression analysis suggested that the independent predictors affecting the 90-day prognosis of ACLF patients were age(OR=1.045,P=0.007), HE(OR=4. 341,P<0.001), PT( OR=1.241,P=0.001), PTA( OR=1.097,P=0.009) and INR( OR=0.532,P=0.027) ( P<0.05). The equation of the new model was : NEWM=-72.662 + 0.044 × age + 0.216 × PT + 0.093 × PTA-0.631 × INR + 1.468 × HE, and the ROC curve analysis showed that the AUC value of this model was 0.81( 95% CI: 0. 74 ~ 0.87) significantly higher than the MELD score of 0.67( 95% CI: 0.59 ~ 0.74), MELD-Na score 0.65( 95% CI:0. 57 ~ 0.73), iMELD score 0.70(95% CI:0. 62 ~ 0.77) and MESO score 0.66( 95% CI:0. 58 ~ 0.74), and the NEWM score had a significantly better predictive ability of 90-day survival in patients with ACLF than other scores. Conclusion Compared to the previous MELD series of scores, the NEWM is a simple and effective tool for predicting the prognosis of patients with ACLF.

Key words: Acute-on-chronic liver failure, Prognostic model, Risk factors