肝脏 ›› 2019, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (10): 1119-1124.

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

低脂与低碳水化合物饮食治疗非酒精性脂肪肝的meta分析

张玉亭, 黄一沁, 陈洁, 保志军   

  1. 200040 上海 复旦大学附属华东医院消化内科
  • 收稿日期:2019-07-15 发布日期:2020-03-27
  • 通讯作者: 陈洁,Email:laughchen@126.com

Meta analysis of low-fat and low-carbohydrate diet for the treatment of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

ZHANG Yu-ting, HUANG Yi-qin, CHEN Jie, BAO Zhi-jun   

  1. Department of Gastroenterology, East China Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China
  • Received:2019-07-15 Published:2020-03-27
  • Contact: CHEN Jie, Email: laughchen@126.com

摘要: 目的 评价低脂饮食(LFD)与低碳水化合物饮食(LCD)干预非酒精性脂肪肝(NAFLD)的效果。方法 利用PubMed、EMBASE、Medline、Cochrane library、web of science、中国知网(CNKI)、万方数据等数据库,检索自建库至 2019 年1月发表的有关于LFD与LCD干预NAFLD患者的临床随机对照试验,根据饮食干预中碳水化合物的比例将研究分为极低碳水化合物饮食组(VLCKD)、低碳水化合物饮食组(LCD)、中等碳水化合物饮食组(MCD)及高碳水化合物饮食组(HCD)并使用Stata11.0对所获数据进行meta分析。结果 共纳入符合要求的文献11篇,共计420例NAFLD患者。分析结果显示:VLCKD组相对于LFD组,在改善NAFLD患者体质量、TC、TG、HDL、LDL、ALT、AST、GGT及肝脏脂肪含量方面差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);MCD饮食较LFD组可以降低NAFLD患者的TG水平(MD=-32.141,95% CI[-58.280,-6.001],P= 0.016),但在改善体质量、TC、HDL、LDL、ALT、AST、GGT及肝脂肪含量方面差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);HCD组相对于LFD组可以降低NAFLD患者的TC水平(MD=-0.59,95% CI[-0.979,-0.201],P= 0.003),而在改善体质量、TG、HDL、LDL、ALT、AST、GGT及肝脂肪含量方面差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 目前有关LCD与LFD在NAFLD治疗上孰优孰劣的证据仍然缺乏,应该进行更多的调查和循证研究来评估LCD长期作用及稳定性。

关键词: 非酒精性脂肪肝, 低碳水化合物饮食, 低脂饮食, 疗效, Meta 分析

Abstract: Objective To evaluate the curative effect of the low-fat diet (LFD) and low-carbohydrate diet (LCD) on non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Methods Databases including PubMed, Embase, Medline, Cochrane library, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure and Wanfang Data were searched from inception to January 2019 for the randomized controlled trials on LFD or LCD in NAFLD therapy. Patients in studies included were divided into the very low-carbohydrate diet (VLCD) group, the LCD group, the medium-carbohydrate diet (MCD) group and the high-carbohydrate diet (HCD) group. And Stata11.0 was used to process the data. Results A total of 11 studies were included, comprising 420 NAFLD patients. There was no statistical difference in the body weight loss, total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride (TG), high density lipoprotein (HDL), low density lipoprotein (LDL), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase (GGT) and intrahepatic fat in patients with NAFLD between VLCD and LCD groups (P>0.05). Compared with the LFD group, the MCD group had lower TG in NAFLD patients (mean difference [MD] =-32.141, 95% confidence interval [CI] -58.280 ~ -6.001, P=0.016), while there were no significant differences in the body weight loss, TC, HDL, LDL, ALT, AST, GGT and intrahepatic fat (P>0.05). The HCD group had lower TC in patients with NAFLD (MD=-0.59, 95%CI -0.979 ~ -0.201, P=0.003), while there were no statistical differences in the body weight loss, TG, HDL, LDL, ALT, AST, GGT and intrahepatic fat (P>0.05). Conclusion There is still a lack of evidence for the superiority of LCD or LFD in the treatment of NAFLD. More evidence-based studies should be conducted to evaluate the long-term effects and stability of LCD.

Key words: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, Low-fat diet, Low-carbohydrate diet, Curative effect, Meta analysis