Chinese Hepatolgy ›› 2021, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (7): 761-764.

• Liver Cancer • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effect of CLCVP during complex laparoscopic hepatectomy on perioperative indicators and prognosis in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

LV Fa-kai1, WANG Deng-ji1, XIE Yu-hui1, ZHANG Yu2   

  1. 1. Zhongjiang People's Hospital, Sichuan 618100, China;
    2. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, Sichuan 610015, China
  • Received:2020-08-06 Online:2021-07-31 Published:2021-09-02
  • Contact: LV Fa-kai,Email:d9f9x1@163.com

Abstract: Objective To investigate the influence of controlled low central venous pressure (CLCVP) in complex laparoscopic hepatectomy on perioperative indicators and prognosis of liver cancer patients. Methods A total of 124 patients with primary liver cancer (PLC) admitted to our hospital from May 2018 to May 2019 were included in the study. They were divided into an observation group and a control group according to the random number table, with 62 patients in each group. The control group underwent complex laparoscopic hepatectomy, and the observation group underwent CLCVP added to complex laparoscopic hepatectomy. The perioperative clinical indicators (operation time, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative blood transfusion, portal block time and hospital stay) and incidence of postoperative complications were compared between the 2 groups. Serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), serum creatinine (SCr), and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) levels were compared before and after surgery in the 2 groups. Moreover, the patients in both groups were followed up for 1 year after operation, and the 1-year postoperative survival rate was calculated. Results All the perioperative indexes in the observation group were better than those in the control group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the levels of ALT, AST, SCr, BUN before operation, or the levels of SCr and BUN 3 and 7 days after operation between the 2 groups (P>0.05). The levels of ALT and AST in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group before operation, 3 and 7 days after operation (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications between the 2 groups (9.68% vs 6.45%, P>0.05). With no cases lost during the 1-year follow-up, there was no statistical difference in the 1-year postoperative survival rate between the 2 groups (82.26% vs 80.65%, P>0.05). Conclusion CLCVP during complex laparoscopic hepatectomy shortens the operation time and hospital stay, reduces intraoperative blood loss, and has no adverse effect on the complications and prognosis of patients with primary liver cancer.

Key words: Primary liver cancer, Laparoscope, Hepatectomy, Liver function, Complications, Prognosis