肝脏 ›› 2021, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (10): 1103-1106.

• 肝癌 • 上一篇    下一篇

肝细胞癌微血管侵犯患者增强CT表现及肿瘤直径观察

盛宝华, 毕腾飞, 王华宇   

  1. 223001 淮安市第一人民医院分院放射科
  • 收稿日期:2021-02-02 出版日期:2021-10-31 发布日期:2021-12-07
  • 通讯作者: 王华宇,Email:973184353@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    淮安市科技项目(HAB201726)

Enhanced CT findings and tumor diameter in patients with microvascular invasion of hepatocellular carcinoma

SHENG Bao-hua, BI Teng-fei, WANG Hua-yu   

  1. Department of Radiology, the First People's Hospital of Huai'an, Jiangsu 223001, China
  • Received:2021-02-02 Online:2021-10-31 Published:2021-12-07
  • Contact: WANG Hua-yu,Email:973184353@qq.com

摘要: 目的 研究肝细胞癌微血管侵犯患者增强CT表现及肿瘤直径变化。方法 回顾性分析2017年10月至2020年10月淮安市第一人民医院接受手术治疗的68例肝细胞癌患者临床资料,按照其有无血管侵犯将其分为侵犯组(n=35)和未侵犯组(n=33)。比较两组CT增强扫描表现(边缘强化程度、肿瘤包膜情况、瘤灶分型、瘤内动脉情况、瘤灶数量)及肿瘤直径,Logistic回归分析增强CT表现及肿瘤直径预测肝细胞癌微血管侵犯的危险因素。结果 未侵犯组有肿瘤包膜、单结节型瘤灶、无瘤内动脉、肿瘤直径<5 cm患者比例高于侵犯组,分别为(66.67%比40.00%)、(66.67%比22.86%)、(60.61%比31.43%)、(66.67%比28.57%),差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。经Logistic回归性分析证实,肿瘤包膜无或不完整(β=1.864,P=0.034,95%CI=1.154~36.073)、瘤灶分型非单结节型(β=0.984,P=0.022,95%CI=1.154~6.196)、有瘤内动脉(β=1.494,P=0.040,95%CI=1.074~18.488)、肿瘤直径≥5 cm(β=1.908,P=0.026,95%CI=1.258~36.122)是肝细胞癌微血管侵犯的危险因素。结论 术前通过增强CT扫描及肿瘤直径观察对辨别肝细胞癌微血管侵犯有较高价值。

关键词: 肝细胞癌, 微血管侵犯, 增强CT扫描

Abstract: Objective To investigate the enhanced computer tomography (CT) findings and tumor diameter in patients with microvascular invasion (MVI) of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods The clinical data of 68 patients with HCC who received surgical treatment in our hospital from October 2017 to October 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. They were divided into invasion group (n=35) and non invasion group (n=33) according to whether complicated with vascular invasion. Enhanced CT findings (edge enhancement, tumor capsule, tumor classification, intratumoral artery, tumor number) and tumor diameter were compared between two groups. The differences between the 2 groups were included in the logistic regression analysis model to evaluate CT findings and tumor diameter and find risk factors of MVI in patients with HCC. Results The proportion of the existence of tumor capsule (66.67% vs 40.00%), single tumor focus (66.67% vs 22.86%), no intratumoral artery (60.61% vs 31.43%) and tumor diameter < 5 cm (66.67% vs 28.57%) of non invasion group were significantly higher than those of invasion group (P<0.05). Logistic regression analysis showed that the risk factors of MVI in patients with HCC were non-capsule or incomplete tumor capsule (β=1.864, P=0.034, 95%CI=1.154 ~ 36.073), non single tumor focus (β=0.984, P=0.022, 95%CI=1.154 ~ 6.196), intratumoral artery (β=1.494, P=0.040, 95%CI=1.074 ~ 18.488) and tumor diameter ≥5 cm (β=1.908, P=0.026, 95%CI=1.258~36.122). Conclusion Enhanced CT scan and tumor diameter observation have a high value in diagnosing MVI of patients with HCC before operation.

Key words: Hepatocellular carcinoma, Microvascular invasion, Enhanced computer tomography scan