超声造影评估肝硬化小肝癌的价值及其与血清AFP-L3、GPC3、GP73水平的关系

肝脏 ›› 2024, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (9): 1056-1059.

超声造影评估肝硬化小肝癌的价值及其与血清AFP-L3、GPC3、GP73水平的关系

刘翠翠, 贺薏, 邱婧琦, 梁爽, 王倩, 张志博

066000 河北北京中医药大学东方医院秦皇岛医院(秦皇岛市中医医院超声科)

收稿日期:2023-11-30 出版日期:2024-09-30 发布日期:2024-11-13
通讯作者: 张志博, Email:799409653@qq.com
基金资助:
河北省自然科学基金资助项目(H2021206140)

The significance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in assessing hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic patients and its association with serum levels of AFP-L3, GPC3 and GP73

LIU Cui-cui, HE Yi, QIU Jing-qi, LIANG Shuang, WANG Qian, ZHANG Zhi-bo

Department of Ultrasound, Dongfang Hospital Qinhuangdao Hospital, Beijing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (Qinhuangdao Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital), Hebei 066000, China

Received:2023-11-30 Online:2024-09-30 Published:2024-11-13
Contact: ZHANG Zhi-bo, Email:799409653@qq.com

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的分析超声造影在评估肝硬化伴小肝癌中的应用价值,及其与血清AFP-L3、GPC3、GP73水平之间的相关性。方法选取2020年1月至2023年1月秦皇岛市中医医院接收的肝硬化患者124例,其中小肝癌患者为观察组(n=71),良性病变患者为对照组(n=53)。对两组患者进行超声造影检测,对比分析其动脉期、门静脉期和延迟期的增强特征,以及超声造影的各项指标:达峰时间(TTP)、峰值强度(PI)、增强时间(ET)、增强斜率(ES)和微血管密度(MVD),并检测甲胎蛋白异质体-L3( AFP-L3)、磷脂酰肌醇蛋白聚糖-3(GPC3)、高尔基体糖蛋白-73(GP73)等癌症相关标志物。Pearson相关分析超声造影参数与肿瘤标志物之间的相关性,ROC曲线下面积(AUC)评估超声造影的诊断效能。结果观察组患者动脉门高增强例数、PI、ES、MVD、AFP-L3、GPC3、GP73水平分别为65例、(28.93±2.14) dB、(2.42±0.48)、(52.35±4.12)条、(1409.57±15.02)ng/L、(751.48±62.68)pg/mL、(120.43±12.53)ng/mL,均高于对照组的17例、(22.10±1.67) dB、(0.86±0.21)、(31.84±2.47)条、(1213.35±13.74)ng/L、(583.84±49.11)pg/mL、(106.59±10.71)ng/mL,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组TTP和ET分别为(26.12±2.01) s、(19.07±1.73)s,对照组分别为(35.23±2.78) s、(23.64±2.04)s,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。相关性分析表明肿瘤生物标志物的水平与PI、ES和MVD显示出正相关性,与TTP、ET呈负相关(P<0.05)。TTP、PI、ET、ES和联合检测评估肝硬化小肝癌的AUC分别为0.857、0.872、0.887、0.855、0.943。结论超声造影参数与肝硬化伴小肝癌患者的肿瘤标志物水平有显著相关性,且具有较高的诊断价值,值得临床推广。

关键词: 超声造影, 肝硬化伴小肝癌, 血清指标, Pearson分析

Abstract: Objective To evaluate the efficacy of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) in assessing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in cirrhotic patients and its association with serum levels of Alpha-fetoprotein-L3 (AFP-L3), Glypican-3 (GPC3), and Golgi Protein-73 (GP73). Methods A total of 124 patients with cirrhosis treated between January 2020 and January 2023 were selected as study subjects. Within them, seventy one patients with small HCC were set as the observation group, and 53 patients with benign lesions were designated as the control group. All patients underwent CEUS to compare the arterial phase, portal phase, and delayed phase enhancement, as well as CEUS parameters (TTP, PI, ET, ES), and MicroVascular Density (MVD). Tumor markers including AFP-L3, GPC3, and GP73 were also measured. Pearson correlation analysis was used to investigate the relationship between CEUS parameters and tumor markers, and the diagnostic efficiency of CEUS was analyzed using ROC curve method. Results The number of cases with arterial portal enhancement, PI, ES, MVD, and levels of AFP-L3, GPC3, GP73 in the observation group were 65 cases, (28.93±2.14) dB, (2.42±0.48), (52.35±4.12) strips, (1409.57±15.02) ng/L, (751.48±62.68) pg/mL, (120.43±12.53) ng/mL, respectively, all higher than those in the control group [17 cases, (22.10±1.67) dB, (0.86±0.21), (31.84±2.47) strips, (1213.35±13.74) ng/L, (583.84±49.11) pg/mL, (106.59±10.71) ng/mL], with P<0.05. The TTP and ET in the observation group were (26.12±2.01) s and (19.07±1.73) s, and in the control group were (35.23±2.78) s and (23.64±2.04) s, respectively, with the observation group being lower than those of the control group, P<0.05. Correlation analysis showed that the levels of tumor biomarkers were positively correlated with PI, ES, and MVD, and negatively correlated with TTP and ET (P<0.05). The area under the ROC curve reached 0.972. Conclusion There is a significant correlation between CEUS parameters and serum levels of tumor markers in cirrhotic patients with HCC. CEUS has a high diagnostic value which is worthy of clinical promotion.

Key words: Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound, Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Cirrhosis, Serum Indicators, Correlation Analysis

刘翠翠, 贺薏, 邱婧琦, 梁爽, 王倩, 张志博. 超声造影评估肝硬化小肝癌的价值及其与血清AFP-L3、GPC3、GP73水平的关系[J]. 肝脏, 2024, 29(9): 1056-1059.

LIU Cui-cui, HE Yi, QIU Jing-qi, LIANG Shuang, WANG Qian, ZHANG Zhi-bo. The significance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in assessing hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic patients and its association with serum levels of AFP-L3, GPC3 and GP73[J]. Chinese Hepatolgy, 2024, 29(9): 1056-1059.

/ 推荐

参考文献

[1] 许志辉,严超,骆红,等.超声造影对肝硬化合并小肝癌的早期诊断价值[J].中国超声医学杂志,2023,39(1):42-44.
[2] 李昶田.常规超声与超声造影在肝癌监测中的应用:一项前瞻性多中心的随机对照研究[J].中华医学杂志,2022,102(7):522.
[3] Chen J, Niu C, Yang N,et al. Biomarker discovery and application-An opportunity to resolve the challenge of liver cancer diagnosis and treatment[J]. Pharmacol Res, 2023 ,189:106674.
[4] Guo X, Tian C, Liu G, et al. Diagnostic efficacy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound, dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI combined with tumor markers AFP and DCP for primary hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Biotechnol Genet Eng Rev, 2023,:1-15.
[5] 中华医学会传染病与寄生虫病学分会和肝病学分会.病毒性肝炎防治方案[J].中华肝脏病杂志,2000,8(6):324-329.
[6] Chen S, Qiu YJ, Zhang Q, et al. Impact of hepatocellular carcinoma tumor size on sonazoid contrast-enhanced ultrasound enhancement features[J]. Ultrasound Med Biol, 2023:S0301-5629(23)00282-X.
[7] Fanoodi A, Maharati A, Akhlaghipour I, et al. MicroRNAs as the critical regulators of tumor angiogenesis in liver cancer[J]. Pathol Res Pract, 2023,251:154913.
[8] Gong X, Ying H, Zhang Z,et al. Ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging features of kaposiform hemangioendothelioma and tufted angioma[J]. J Dermatol, 2019, 46(10):835-842.
[9] Renzulli M, Brandi N, Argalia G, et al. Morphological, dynamic and functional characteristics of liver pseudolesions and benign lesions[J]. Radiol Med, 2022, 127(2):129-144.
[10] Tang L, Zhang Y, Zhou Q, et al. The relationship between ultrasonographic features of hepatocellular carcinoma and the severity of hepatocellular carcinoma and the expression of PTEN and Tg73[J]. J Healthc Eng, 2022, 2022:2608633.
[11] Qiu T, Hameed NUF, Lin CP, et al. Hemodynamic scaling of task-induced signal changes in tumor subjects[J]. Front Hum Neurosci, 2020 ,14:569463.
[12] He Z, Huang Q, Liao Y, et al. Artificial intelligence algorithm in classification and recognition of primary hepatic carcinoma images under magnetic resonance imaging[J]. Contrast Media Mol Imaging, 2022, 2022:8950600.
[13] Chau J, Young AC, Dhand N,et al. Estimation of time to peak contrast enhancement of the aorta and liver for dual-phase computed tomography on the basis of contrast medium arrival time, injection duration, and injection technique in dogs[J]. Am J Vet Res, 2016, 77(10):1093-100.
[14] He Y, Liu F, Mou S, et al. Prognostic analysis of hepatocellular carcinoma on the background of liver cirrhosis via contrast-enhanced ultrasound and pathology[J]. Oncol Lett, 2018 ,15(3):3746-3752.
[15] Force M, Park G, Chalikonda D, et al. Alpha-fetoprotein and AFP-L3 is most useful in detection of recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients after tumor ablation and with low AFP level[J]. Viruses, 2022, 14(4):775.