肝脏 ›› 2025, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (12): 1728-1734.

• 其他肝病 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同类型慢性肝病患者生活质量的对比分析

孟春艳, 闫宝书   

  1. 100050 北京 首都医科大学附属北京友谊医院肝病中心,国家消化系统疾病临床医学研究中心,消化全国重点实验室
  • 收稿日期:2025-10-10 发布日期:2026-02-10
  • 通讯作者: 闫宝书,Email:zhiyuchen66@vip.sina.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家临床重点专科建设项目(2022001)

A comparative analysis of quality of life among patients with different types of chronic liver diseases

MENG Chun-yan, YAN Bao-shu   

  1. Hepatology Center of Beijing Friendship Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive System Diseases, State Key Laboratory of Vigestive Health, Beijing 100050, China
  • Received:2025-10-10 Published:2026-02-10

摘要: 目的 探讨不同类型慢性肝病患者的生活质量及其相关影响因素,为慢性肝病患者的综合管理和健康促进提供依据。方法 采用横断面调查方法,纳入2024年4月至2025年3月在首都医科大学附属北京友谊医院接受肝组织活检的慢性肝病患者220例。收集患者人口学与临床资料,包括血常规及肝生化指标,同时采用SF-36量表评估患者生活质量。根据肝病类型分为肝硬化与非肝硬化组、自身免疫性肝病与非自身免疫性肝病组,比较各组的临床特征及生活质量,分析与生活质量相关的影响因素。结果 肝硬化组患者年龄高于非肝硬化组,分别为51.0 (39.0, 59.8)岁和54.5 (48.0, 62.5)岁(P=0.043)。此外,肝硬化组的血红蛋白(Hb)和血小板计数(PLT)均显著降低,总胆红素(TBil)升高,白蛋白(Alb)及凝血酶原时间(PT)降低,差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。与轻度炎症(G0-2)患者相比,中重度炎症(G3-4)患者在生理职能[75.0 (25.0, 100.0) vs. 75.0 (0.0, 100.0)]和心理健康[78.0 (52.0, 87.0) vs. 65.0 (49.0, 80.0)]方面差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。与非肝硬化组相比,肝硬化组患者的生理职能[50.0 (0.0, 93.8) vs. 75.0 (25.0, 100.0)]较差,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。然而,自身免疫性肝病组与非自身免疫性肝病组在各维度生活质量评分上的差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 慢性肝病患者生活质量与疾病严重程度呈负相关。建议临床工作中重视慢性肝病患者的生活质量评估及管理,早期进行多维度干预,优化个体化治疗和护理方案,以提高患者的健康结局和生活质量。

关键词: 慢性肝病, 肝硬化, 自身免疫性肝病, 生活质量, 对比分析

Abstract: Objective To investigate the quality of life (QoL) and its associated factors among patients with different types of chronic liver disease, and to provide evidence for comprehensive management and health promotion in this population. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted including 220 patients with chronic liver disease who underwent liver biopsy at Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, between April 2024 and March 2025. Demographic and clinical data were collected, including complete blood count and liver function tests. The Short Form-36 (SF-36) questionnaire was used to evaluate QoL. Patients were categorized into cirrhosis and non-cirrhosis groups, as well as autoimmune and non-autoimmune liver disease groups. Clinical characteristics and QoL scores were compared between groups, and factors associated with QoL were analyzed. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 21.0. Results Patients in the cirrhosis group were older than those in the non-cirrhosis group, with median ages of 54.5 (48.0, 62.5) years and 51.0 (39.0, 59.8) years, respectively (P=0.043). Compared with the non-cirrhosis group, patients with cirrhosis showed significantly lower hemoglobin (Hb) and platelet (PLT) levels, higher total bilirubin (TBil), lower albumin (Alb), and prolonged prothrombin time (PT), all with statistically significant differences (P<0.05). Compared with patients exhibiting mild inflammation (G0–2), those with moderate to severe inflammation (G3–4) showed significantly lower scores in physical functioning[75.0 (25.0, 100.0) vs. 75.0 (0.0, 100.0)] and mental health [78.0 (52.0, 87.0) vs. 65.0 (49.0, 80.0)] domains (P<0.05). In terms of quality of life, patients with cirrhosis had lower physical functioning scores than those without cirrhosis[50.0 (0.0, 93.8) vs. 75.0 (25.0, 100.0); P<0.05]. However, there were no statistically significant differences in any quality of life dimensions between patients with autoimmune liver diseases and those with non-autoimmune liver diseases (P>0.05). Conclusion QoL of patients with chronic liver diseases is negatively correlated with disease severity. Comprehensive assessment and management of QoL should be emphasized in clinical practice. Early multidimensional interventions and individualized treatment and nursing strategies are recommended to optimize outcomes and improve QoL in patients with chronic liver disease.

Key words: Chronic liver disease, Cirrhosis, Autoimmune liver disease, Quality of life, Comparative analysis