肝脏 ›› 2025, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (5): 595-598.

• 肝纤维化及肝硬化 • 上一篇    下一篇

富马酸丙酚替诺福韦联合扶正化瘀片治疗乙型肝炎肝硬化代偿期患者的临床效果

张艳, 温青萍, 钱花, 石荔   

  1. 850000 拉萨 西藏自治区人民医院感染科
  • 收稿日期:2024-06-10 出版日期:2025-05-31 发布日期:2025-07-04
  • 通讯作者: 石荔,Email: shili6869@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    西藏自治区科技厅“2022年中央引导地方”项目(XZ202201YD0036C)

An analysis on the clinical effect of propofol tenofovir fumarate combined with fuzhenghuayu tablet in the treatment of compensated patients with hepatitis B-related cirrhosis

ZHANG Yan, WEN Qing-ping, QIAN Hua, SHI Li   

  1. Department of Infection, People's Hospital of Tibet Autonomous Region, Lhasa 850000, China
  • Received:2024-06-10 Online:2025-05-31 Published:2025-07-04
  • Contact: SHI Li, Email: shili6869@163.com

摘要: 目的 比较富马酸丙酚替诺福韦(TAF)联合扶正化瘀片(FZHY)与单用TAF对西藏地区乙型肝炎肝硬化代偿期患者的疗效。方法 纳入西藏自治区人民医院乙型肝炎肝硬化代偿期患者60例,根据随机数字表法分成两组,每组各30例。对照组患者予以TAF治疗,研究组患者予以TAF联合FZHY治疗,疗程均为24周。比较两组治疗前和治疗后的肝生化指标、血清肝纤维化指标、HBV DNA转阴率、肝硬度值、不良反应发生率。结果 对照组治疗前、后AST为(51.97±3.77)U/L、(25.93±1.19)U/L,研究组为(49.23±3.29)U/L、(25.80±1.01)U/L;对照组治疗前、后ALT为(55.17±3.48)U/L、(30.83±1.52)U/L,研究组为(53.26±1.98)U/L、(24.87±2.68)U/L;对照组治疗前、后TBil为(17.10±1.23)μmol/L、(14.33±1.18)μmol/L,研究组为(19.03±3.16)μmol/L、(16.63±3.2)μmol/L;对照组治疗前、后Alb为(35.65±0.57)g/L、(37.23±0.51)g/L,研究组为(35.44±0.33)g/L、(38.10±0.51)g/L。两组HA、LN、PCⅢ、Ⅳ-C在治疗后较治疗前均有显著下降,对照组治疗前、后HA为(293.47±8.66)ng/mL、(259.20±8.83)ng/mL,研究组为(296.77±9.10)ng/mL、(215.57±9.07)ng/mL;对照组治疗前、后LN为(193.23±6.34)ng/mL、(125.87±6.98)ng/mL,研究组为(192.23±7.57)ng/mL、(91.80±4.12)ng/mL;对照组治疗前、后PCⅢ为(251.07±11.60)ng/mL、(199.10±8.13)ng/mL,研究组为(252.07±10.60)ng/mL、(123.02±6.38)ng/mL;对照组治疗前、后Ⅳ-C 为(243.30±8.09)ng/mL、(192.23±7.57)ng/mL,研究组为(249.93±8.02)ng/mL、(139.67±3.45)ng/mL(均P<0.05),且研究组治疗后下降值明显高于对照组(P<0.05)。两组治疗前及治疗24周后HBV DNA转阴率差异均无统计学意义(χ2=0.150,P=0.698)。治疗24周后两组肝硬度值较治疗前均有下降,对照组治疗前、后为(13.03±0.35)kPa、(11.69±0.36)kPa,研究组为(13.67±0.35)kPa、(9.73±0.44)kPa,且对照组下降更显著(P<0.05)。对照组和研究组不良反应发生率分别为6.67%和10%,差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.218,P=1.000)。结论 TAF联合FZHY较单用TAF治疗乙型肝炎肝硬化代偿期患者能更有效地抑制或逆转肝硬化。

关键词: 西藏地区, 富马酸丙酚替诺福韦, 扶正化瘀片, 乙型肝炎肝硬化代偿期

Abstract: Objective To investigate the difference between the efficacy of propofol tenofovir fumarate (TAF) combined with Fuzheng Huayu Tablet (FZHY) and TAF alone in compensated patients with hepatitis B-related cirrhotic patients in Xizang. Methods The clinical data of 60 patients with compensatory hepatitis B cirrhosis were analyzed and divided into two groups with 30 patients in each group according to random number table method. The control group was treated with TAF, and the study group was treated with TAF combined with FZHY. The treatment course of both groups was 24 weeks. The liver biochemical indexes, serum liver fibrosis indexes, HBV DNA negative conversion rate, liver hardness and incidence of adverse reactions were compared between the two groups before and after treatment. Results ALT, AST and TBil levels in both of the control group and study group were significantly decreased after 24 weeks of treatment compared with those of before treatment (AST levels of the control group before/after treatment: 51.97±3.77 U/L/25.93±1.19 U/L; AST levels of the study group before/after treatment: 49.23±3.29 U/L/25.80±1.01 U/L; ALT levels of the control group before/after treatment: 55.17±3.48 U/L/30.83±1.52 U/L; ALT levels of the study group before/after treatment: 53.26±1.98U/L/24.87±2.68 U/L; TBil levels of the control group before/after treatment: 17.10±1.23 μmol/L/14.33±1.18 μmol/L; TBil levels of the study group before/after treatment: 19.03±3.16 μmol/L/16.63±3.2 μmol/L), but Alb levels were not significantly increased after treatment (Alb levels of the control group before/after treatment: 35.65±0.57 g/L/37.23±0.51 g/L; Alb levels of the study group before/after treatment: 35.44±0.33 g/L/38.10±0.51 g/L). HA, LN, PCⅢ and Ⅳ-C in both groups decreased significantly after treatment compared with those of before treatment (HA levels in the control group before/after treatment: 293.47±8.66 ng/mL/259.20±8.83 ng/mL; HA levels in the study group before/after treatment: 296.77±9.10 ng/mL/215.57±9.07 ng/mL; LN levels in the control group before/after treatment: 193.23±6.34 ng/mL/125.87±6.98 ng/mL; LN levels in the study group before/after treatment: 192.23±7.57 ng/mL/91.80±4.12 ng/mL; PCⅢ levels in the control group before/after treatment: 251.07±11.60 ng/mL/199.10±8.13 ng/mL; PCⅢ levels in the study group before/after treatment: 252.07±10.60 ng/mL/123.02±6.38 ng/mL; Ⅳ-C levels in the control group before/after treatment: 243.30±8.09 ng/mL/192.23±7.57 ng/mL, Ⅳ-C levels in the study group before/after treatment: 249.93±8.02 ng/mL/139.67±3.45 ng/mL; P<0.05). The decrease values of the study group after treatment were significantly higher than those of the control group (P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the negative HBV DNA conversion rate between the two groups at before and after 24 weeks of treatment (χ2=0.150, P=0.698). After 24 weeks of treatment, the liver hardness level in both groups decreased compared with that of before treatment (13.03±0.35/11.69±0.36 in control group and 13.67±0.35/9.73±0.44 in study group), and the decrease was more significant in control group (P<0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions in the control group and the study group was 6.67% and 10%, respectively, with no significant difference between the two groups (χ2=0.218, P=1.000). Conclusion TAF combined with FZHY can improve liver hardness better than TAF alone in patients with liver cirrhosis in compensatory stage, suggesting that it can inhibit or reverse liver cirrhosis more effectively.

Key words: Tibet, Fumaric acid propofol tenofovir, Fuzheng huayu tablets, Compensated period of hepatitis B cirrhosis