肝脏 ›› 2024, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (9): 1105-1108.

• 病毒性肝炎 • 上一篇    下一篇

抗病毒治疗慢性乙型肝炎患者发生低病毒血症的危险因素

何谱, 刘文宗   

  1. 050000 河北石家庄 石家庄市第五医院普外科
  • 收稿日期:2024-03-25 出版日期:2024-09-30 发布日期:2024-11-13
  • 基金资助:
    2019年度河北省医学科学研究重点课题(20191456)

Risk factors for hypoviremia in chronic hepatitis B patients undergoing antiviral therapy: A comprehensive analysis

HE Pu, LIU Wen-zong   

  1. Department of General Surgery, Shijiazhuang Fifth Hospital, Hebei 050000, China
  • Received:2024-03-25 Online:2024-09-30 Published:2024-11-13

摘要: 目的 探讨抗病毒治疗慢性乙型肝炎患者发生低病毒血症的危险因素。方法 选取石家庄市第五医院抗病毒治疗的慢性乙型肝炎患者108例,分为低病毒血症组60例,完全病毒学应答组48例。比较两组患者的临床资料,logistic回归模型分析患者发生低病毒血症的危险因素。结果 低病毒血症的二线初治率显著高于完全病毒学应答组,为18.75%(6/32)比2.63%(2/76),用药依从性显著低于完全病毒学应答组为71.88%(23/32)比 91.67%(55/76),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组的AST为(30.22±8.34)U/L比(28.30±8.23)U/L、ALT为(25.35±3.49)U/L比(27.03±4.63)U/L、TBil为(14.35±3.71)μmol/L比(13.74±2.87)μmol/L及HBcAb为(94.66±23.82)S/CO比(95.14±26.73)S/CO,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。低病毒血症组的HBeAg阳性率为59.38%比10.53%、HBsAg为(3.24±0.36)IgIU/ml比(2.87±0.32)IgIU/ml、基线HBV DNA为(7.40±1.33)比(5.78±1.42),均显著高于完全病毒学应答组(P<0.05)。用药情况(二线初治)、HBeAg阳性、HBsAg水平、基线HBV DNA水平与完全病毒学应答呈负相关(r=-0.411、-0.352、-0.413、-0.492,P<0.05),用药依从性好与完全病毒学应答呈正相关(r=0.425,P<0.05)。Logistic回归分析结果显示,HBeAg阳性、HBsAg水平、基线HBV DNA水平是低病毒血症的危险因素(OR=2.809、1.861、1.311,P<0.05),用药依从性好是低病毒血症的保护因素(OR=0.810,P<0.05)。结论 慢性乙型肝炎患者抗病毒治疗前HBeAg阳性、HBV DNA高载量、HBsAg高定量是发生低病毒血症的危险因素,用药依从性好则有助于获得病毒学应答,临床应尽早对具备高危因素的CHB患者采取针对性干预措施。

关键词: 低病毒血症, 抗病毒治疗, 慢性乙型肝炎, 危险因素, 病毒学应答

Abstract: Objective To identify risk factors associated with hypoviremia in chronic hepatitis B patients receiving antiviral therapy. Methods A total of 108 chronic hepatitis B patients receiving antiviral treatment at our hospital were selected for this study. Based on high-sensitivity HBV DNA quantitative testing results, they were catergorized into a hypoviremia group (60 cases) and a complete virological response group (48 cases). Clinical data from both groups were collected and compared, and logistic regression analysis was employed to identify risk factors associated with hypoviremia. Results The rate of second-line initial treatment in the hypoviremia group was significantly higher than that in the complete virological response group(18.75% vs 2.63%,P<0.05), while the medication adherence rate was significantly lower (71.88% vs 91.67%, P<0.05). No statistically significant differences were observed bettwen the two groups in AST[(30.22±8.34)U/L vs (28.30±8.23)U/L],ALT[(25.35±3.49)U/L vs (27.03±4.63)U/L],TBil[(14.35±3.71)μmol/L vs (13.74±2.87)μmol/L], or HBcAb levels[(94.66±23.82)S/CO vs (95.14±26.73)S/CO] (P>0.05). However, the hypoviremia group exhibted significantly higher rates of HBeAg positivity(59.38% vs 10.53%), HBsAg levels[(3.24±0.36)IgIU/ml vs (2.87±0.32)IgIU/ml], and baseline HBV DNA levels[(7.40±1.33) vs (5.78±1.42)] compared to the complete virological response group (P<0.05). The factors of second-line initial treatment, HBeAg positivity, HBsAg levels, and baseline HBV DNA levels were negatively correlated with complete virological response(r=-0.411, -0.352, -0.413, -0.492,P<0.05), while good medication adherence is positively correlated (r=0.425,P<0.05). Logistic regression analysis identified HBeAg positivity, HBsAg levels, and baseline HBV DNA levels as significant risk factors for hypoviremia(OR=2.809,1.861,1.311,P<0.05), whereas good medication adherence emerged as a protective factor(OR=0.810,P<0.05). Conclusion Positive HBeAg, elevated HBV DNA load, and high HBsAg levels prior to antiviral treatment are significant risk factors for the develpment of hypoviremia in chronic hepatitis B patients. Ensuring good medication adherence is crucial for achieving virological responses. Early, targeted interventions should be implemented in clinical practice for CHB patients identified with these high-risk factors.

Key words: Hypoviremia, Antiviral therapy, Chronic hepatitis B, Risk factors, virological response