肝脏 ›› 2025, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (3): 343-346.

• 肝癌 • 上一篇    下一篇

aMAP评分联合肝硬度值对乙型肝炎肝硬化相关肝细胞癌的预测价值

康娅, 马金鑫   

  1. 716000 陕西 延安大学附属医院消化内科
  • 收稿日期:2023-11-26 出版日期:2025-03-31 发布日期:2025-06-16
  • 通讯作者: 马金鑫,Email: 4149653@qq.com

Predictive value of aMAP risk score combined with liver stiffness measurement for hepatocellular carcinoma associated with hepatitis B cirrhosis

KANG Ya, MA Jin-xin   

  1. Department of Gastroenterology,Yan'an University Affiliated Hospital, Shaanxi,716000, China
  • Received:2023-11-26 Online:2025-03-31 Published:2025-06-16
  • Contact: MA Jin-xin, Email:4149653@qq.com

摘要: 目的 评估aMAP评分联合LSM对乙型肝炎肝硬化相关肝细胞癌的预测性能。方法 收集2013年1月—2017年1月在延安大学附属医院住院的乙型肝炎肝硬化患者416例,计算aMAP评分,并对aMAP联合LSM模型预测性能进行评估。结果 aMAP+LSM的预测性能最高,优于单独的aMAP及LSM,对应的AUROC分别为0.748(0.703-0.789)、0.697(0.650-0.740)、0.721(0.676-0.764)。 LSM的最佳临界值为15.35 kPa,灵敏度为70.0%,特异度为68.5%。aMAP高危组患者肝细胞癌的3、5年累积发病率高于中、低危组患者(P均<0.05),分别为4.5%、14.5%,2.6%、5.8%,0.0%、0.0%;在中危组患者中,当LSM>15.35 kPa时,肝细胞癌的3、5年累积发病率为10.0%、20.0%,当LSM<15.35 kPa时,肝细胞癌的3、5年累积发病率仅为0.0%、0.6%(P<0.05)。结论 aMAP联合LSM模型的预测性能优于单独aMAP评分,且涉及变量简单易获取,便于临床筛查。LSM的最佳临界值为15.35 kPa,在中危组人群中,与LSM<15.35 kPa相比,LSM>15.35 kPa时肝细胞癌累积发病率显著增加,应参照aMAP高危人群进行管理,进行肝细胞癌的筛查。

关键词: 肝细胞癌, 肝硬化, aMAP评分, LSM

Abstract: Objective To evaluate the predictive performance of aMAP score combined with liver stiffness measurement (LSM) for hepatocellular carcinoma associated with hepatitis B cirrhosis.Methods A total of 416 patients with hepatitis B cirrhosis were selected to calculate the aMAP score and evaluate the predictive performance of the aMAP combined with LSM model.Results The predictive performance of aMAP+LSM is the highest, superior to that of aMAP and LSM alone, with corresponding AUROCs of 0.748 (0.703-0.789), 0.697 (0.650-0.740), and 0.721 (0.676-0.764), respectively. The optimal critical value of LSM is 15.35 kPa, with a sensitivity of 70.0% and a specificity of 68.5%. The 3-year and 5-year cumulative incidence rate of hepatocellular carcinoma in high-risk group was higher than that in intermediate and low-risk group (P<0.05), which were 4.5%, 14.5%, 0.0%, 5.8%, 0.0% and 0.0%, respectively. In the intermediate-risk group, when LSM>15.35 kPa, the 3-year and 5-year cumulative incidence rate of HCC is 10.0% and 20.0%, and when LSM<15.35 kPa, the 3-year and 5-year cumulative incidence rate of HCC is only 0.0% and 0.6% (P<0.05).Conclusion The predictive performance of aMAP combined with LSM model is better than that of aMAP score alone, and the variables involved are simple and easy to obtain, making it easy for clinical screening. The optimal critical value of LSM is 15.35 kPa. In the medium risk group, compared with LSM<15.35 kPa, the cumulative incidence rate of hepatocellular carcinoma increased significantly when LSM>15.35 kPa. It should be managed according to the high-risk population of aMAP to screen hepatocellular carcinoma.

Key words: Hepatocellular carcinoma, Liver cirrhosis, aMAP risk score, LSM