肝脏 ›› 2025, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (9): 1192-1194.

• 代谢相关脂肪性肝病 • 上一篇    下一篇

超声肝脏脂肪分数定量评估肝脏脂肪变性的临床研究

钱嵘, 张震, 王成晨, 郭明阳, 何沈岩, 陈慧冲, 涂娇, 陈婷婷, 刘婷, 裴峰   

  1. 200052 上海 解放军海军第905医院超声诊断科(钱嵘,张震,王成晨,郭明阳,何沈岩,陈慧冲,涂娇,陈婷婷,刘婷);201103 上海 中国人民武装警察部队上海总队医院医学影像科(裴峰)
  • 收稿日期:2025-03-15 出版日期:2025-09-30 发布日期:2025-11-05
  • 通讯作者: 裴峰,Email:peifeng1968@sina.com
  • 作者简介:共同第一作者:张震
  • 基金资助:
    上海市长宁区科委资助项目(CNKW2022Y61)

A clinical study on quantitative assessment of hepatic steatosis using ultrasound-derived fat fraction

QIAN Rong1, ZHANG Zhen1, WANG Cheng-chen1, GUO Ming-yang1, HE Shen-yan1, CHEN Hui-chong1, TU Jiao1, CHEN Ting-ting1, LIU Ting1, PEI Feng2   

  1. 1. Department of Ultrasound,The 905th Naval Hospital,Shanghai 200052,China;
    2. Department of Medical Imaging, Shanghai General Hospital of The Chinese People's Armed Police Force, Shanghai 201103, China
  • Received:2025-03-15 Online:2025-09-30 Published:2025-11-05
  • Contact: PEI Feng,Email:peifeng1968@sina.com

摘要: 目的 探讨超声脂肪分数(UDFF)定量评估非酒精性脂肪肝(NAFLD)患者肝脏脂肪含量的临床价值。方法 纳入2024年1月至12月解放军海军第905医院收治的NAFLD患者40例,另选同期健康志愿者18名。所有受试者先经常规超声检查,再分别检测其肝右叶受控衰减参数(CAP)及UDFF,比较两组CAP及UDFF的差异,分析UDFF和CAP的一致性及相关性。结果 健康志愿组CAP为(223.16± 12.59)dB/m,UDFF为(4.69±1.27)%,均在正常范围,NAFLD组CAP为(258.49± 15.14)dB/m,UDFF为(14.75±2.87)%(P<0.05)。Pearson相关性分析显示,UDFF与CAP在评价肝脏脂肪变性时呈正相关(r=0.938,P<0.001)。Bland-Altman分析二者一致性显示,健康志愿组所有受检者均在95%置信区间内,NAFLD组有95%(38/40)的病例在置信区间内,表明两组受试者肝右叶UDFF和CAP值有良好的一致性。结论 UDFF为无创定量肝脏脂肪含量的检测技术,对评估非酒精性脂肪肝病有较高临床价值。

关键词: 超声脂肪分数, 肝脂肪变性, 非酒精性脂肪肝病, 受控衰减参数

Abstract: Objective To explore the clinical significance of ultrasound-derived fat fraction (UDFF) from the right lobe of liver for quantitatively assessing liver fat content of patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Methods Fifty-eight subjects were selected in this study and divided in Group A (normal control group:18 cases) and Group B (fatty liver group: 40 cases). All subjects first underwent conventional ultrasound examination, followed by measurements of the controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) and UDFF. The differences in CAP and UDFF between the two groups of patients were compared. The consistency and correlation between UDFF and CAP were analyzed. Results Group A had a CAP of (223.16 ± 12.59) dB/m and a UDFF of (4.69 ± 1.27)%, both within the normal range. Group B had a CAP of (258.49 ± 15.14) dB/m and a UDFF of (14.75 ± 2.87)%, both of which were significantly higher than those in Group A (P<0.05). Pearson correlation analysis showed that UDFF and CAP were positively correlated in assessing hepatic steatosis (r=0.938, P<0.001). Bland-Altman analysis of their agreement revealed that all subjects in Group A fell within the 95% confidence interval, while in Group B, 95% (38/40) of the cases were within the confidence interval, indicating a good consistency between UDFF and CAP values in the right liver lobes of patients in both groups. Conclusion UDFF is a non-invasive technique for quantitatively assessing liver fat content and holds significant clinical value in evaluating NAFLD.

Key words: Ultrasound-derived fat fraction, Hepatic steatosis, Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, Controlled attenuation parameter