肝脏 ›› 2019, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (4): 365-367.

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

核苷(酸)类似物抗HBV获得病毒学应答后生化学持续不应答临床分析

金宏慧, 胡晨波, 陈晓蓉, 陆云飞, 冯艳玲   

  1. 201399 上海市浦东新区南华医院肝病科(金宏慧,胡晨波);复旦大学附属公共卫生临床中心中医科(陈晓蓉,陆云飞),病理科(冯艳玲)
  • 收稿日期:2018-11-08 出版日期:2019-04-30 发布日期:2020-04-07
  • 基金资助:
    上海市浦东新区卫生和计划生育委员会科技发展专项基金资助(PW2016A-28)

Clinical analysis of biochemical persistent nonresponse in chronic hepatitis patients with nucleos(t)tide analogue therapeutics achieving virological response

JIN Hong-hui, HU Chen-bo, CHEN Xiao-rong, LU Yun-fei, FENG Yan-ling   

  1. Department of Hepatology, Nanhua Hospital, Pudong New Area, Shanghai 201399
  • Received:2018-11-08 Online:2019-04-30 Published:2020-04-07

摘要: 目的 探讨核苷(酸)类似物(NA)治疗慢性乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)感染者获得病毒学应答后生化学持续不应答导致肝病进展原因。方法 选取2016 年 12 月至 2018 年6月慢性乙型肝炎患者40例,均接受NA抗病毒治疗获得病毒学应答后超过1月生化学持续不应答,进行肝组织病理检查,探明肝病进展原因。结果 40例患者中,非酒精性脂肪性肝炎(NASH))14例,自身免疫性肝炎(AIH)9例,药物性肝炎(DILI)7例,原发性胆汁性胆管炎(PBC)3例,非特异性炎症5例,血色病1例,淀粉样变1例。治疗前ALT(95.15±19.21) U/L,AKP(123.85±39.29) U/L,r-GT(183.15±93.12) U/L;治疗后ALT(36.33±18.28) U/L,AKP(101.10±.37.96) U/L,r-GT(76.50±45.55) U/L;肝脏弹性硬度值测定显著下降,治疗前(10.85±5.63) kPa,治疗后(8.17±4.61) kPa,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 接受NA治疗后获得完全病毒学应答后生化学持续不应答的慢性HBV感染者导致肝病进展常见原因是NASH、AIH、DILI、非特异性炎症、PBC等,应尽早给予必要的临床干预并减少患者的长期不良预后。

关键词: 核苷(酸)类似物, 慢性乙型肝炎, 病毒学应答, 生化学不应答

Abstract: Objective To investigate the causes of biochemical persistent nonresponse in chronic hepatitis B(CHB) patients with nucleos(t)ide analogues treatment achieving virologic response, and lead to liver disease progression. Methods From December 2016 to June 2018, 40 CHB patients treated with nucleos(t)ide analogues who had no biochemical response after achieving virological response over 1 month were selected to undergo liver biopsy to explore the cause of liver disease progress. Results Histopathologic examination of 40 liver biopsy samples showed 14 cases of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis(NASH, 35%), 9 cases of autoimmune hepatitis(AIH, 22.5%), 7 cases of drug-induced liver injury(DILI, 17.5%), 5 cases of nonspecific inflammation(12.5%), 3 cases of primary biliary cholangitis(PBC, 7.5%), 1 case of hemochromatosis(2.5%) and 1 case of amyloidosis(2.5%). After comprehensive treatments including lifestyle improvement, immunoregulation, hepatoprotective management and avoidance of hepatotoxic drugs, biochemical indexes were decreased significantly(alanine transaminase: 36.33±18.28 vs. 95.15±19.21, alkaline phosphatase: 101.10±37.96 vs. 123.85±39.29, gamma-glutamyltransferase: 76.50±45.55 vs. 183.15±93.12, P<0.05) and as was liver stiffness values(8.17±4.61 vs. 10.85±5.63, P<0.05). Conclusion The common causes of biochemical persistent nonresponse in CHB patients with nucleos(t)ide analogues treatment achieving virologic response are NASH, AIH, DILI, nonspecific inflammation and PBC, thus liver disease in these patients progress. Therefore, it is necessary to explore the causes of liver disease progression in order to give clinical intervention and improve the prognosis as soon as possible.

Key words: Nucleos(t)ide analogue, Chronic hepatitis B, Virological response, Biochemical nonresponse