肝脏 ›› 2025, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (10): 1389-1392.

• 代谢相关脂肪性肝病 • 上一篇    下一篇

肝脂方治疗慢乙肝合并代谢相关脂肪性肝病患者临床疗效评价

于笑笑, 周龙, 沈应秋, 王开霞, 汪涛, 刘成海, 屈莉红, 张锋镝   

  1. 200120 上海 同济大学附属东方医院感染科(于笑笑,周龙,沈应秋,王开霞,汪涛,屈莉红,张锋镝);201203 上海 上海中医药大学附属曙光医院肝病研究所(刘成海)
  • 收稿日期:2024-10-10 出版日期:2025-10-31 发布日期:2025-12-16
  • 基金资助:
    浦东新区卫生计生科研面上项目(PW2021A-4);浦东新区国家中医药发展改革试验区建设项目(PDZY-2024-0702);综合医院中西医协同引导项目(ZXXT-202316)

Clinical efficacy of Ganzhi Formula in treating patients with chronic hepatitis B and metabolic-associated fatty liver disease

YU Xiao-xiao1, ZHOU Long1, SHEN Ying-qiu1, WANG Kai-xia1, WANG Tao1, LIU Cheng-hai2, QU Li-hong1, ZHANG Feng-di1   

  1. 1. Department of Infectious Disease, Shanghai East Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai 200120, China;
    2. Institute of Liver Diseases, Shuguang Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), Shanghai 201203, China
  • Received:2024-10-10 Online:2025-10-31 Published:2025-12-16

摘要: 目的 探讨肝脂方联合核苷类药物治疗慢性乙型肝炎(CHB)合并代谢相关脂肪性肝病(MAFLD)的临床疗效。方法 选择2022年1月至2024年7月同济大学附属东方医院收治的CHB合并MAFLD患者84例。随机分为观察组和对照组,每组42例。对照组给予核苷类药物和易善复,观察组在对照组基础上予以肝脂方,两组患者均用药12周。观察治疗前后患者FibroTouch脂肪衰减(CAP)值、血清酶、血脂等变化情况以及中医证候积分、生活质量评分、APRI、FIB-4、FAST、Agile评分。结果 治疗12周后,观察组CAP值显示有效率52.4%(22/42),对照组为31.0%(13/42),差异有统计学意义(χ2=3.967,P=0.046)。 观察组中医证候评分和生活质量评分有效率为83.3%(35/42)和54.8%(23/42),对照组为40.4%(17/42)和9.5%(4/42),差异有统计学意义(χ2=19.184、19.704,P<0.001)。观察组FIB-4评分较对照组改善显著(1.23±0.49)分比(0.93±0.44)分,差异有统计学意义(P=0.004)。观察组LDL水平较对照组显著降低,为2.95(2.54, 3.17)mmol/L比3.15 (2.67, 3.73)mmol/L,(P=0.046)。两组治疗前后肝功能差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 肝脂方联合核苷类药物治疗能够显著改善CHB合并MAFLD患者的CAP值、中医证候和血脂水平,具有较好的临床应用价值。

关键词: 肝脂方, 慢性乙型肝炎, 代谢相关脂肪性肝病, 临床疗效

Abstract: Objective To explore the efficacy of Ganzhi Formula in treatment of patients with CHB and MAFLD. Methods A total of 84 patients from the department of Liver Disease of Dongfang Hospital, Tongji University, who met the inclusion criteria CHB combined with MAFLD, were divided into the observation group and the control group with 42 cases in each group. The control group received NAs and polyene phosphatidyl choline, while the observation group received Ganzhi Formula based on the control group. Both groups received treatment for a total of 12 weeks. Liver imaging (FibroTouch liver stiffness LSM value, CAP value), liver serum enzymes, cholesterol levels, APRI, FIB-4, FAST, Agile, Chinese medicine syndrome, and other changes were collected. Results Following 12 weeks of treatment, the observation group's CAP efficiency was 52.4% (22/42) while the control group's was 31.0% (13/42). This difference was statistically significant (P=0.046). Compared to the control group, the observation group's effective rates of TCM evidence score and quality of life score were considerably higher at 83.3% (35/42) and 54.8% (23/42) compared to 40.4% (17/42) and 9.5% (4/42) in the control group (P<0.001). The FIB-4 score was improved in the observation group (1.23±0.49 vs 0.93±0.44,P=0.004). The levels of LDL in observation group was significantly lower than that of the control group [2.95(2.54, 3.17) vs 3.15 (2.67, 3.73), P=0.046]. There was no significant difference in liver function transaminases between the two groups before and after treatment (P>0.05). Conclusion Ganzhi Formula combined with NAs could significantly improve the CAP value, TCM evidence score, and blood lipid level of patients with CHB and MAFLD, suggesting its clinical application value.

Key words: Ganzhi Formula, Chronic viral hepatitis B, Metabolic-associated fatty liver disease, Clinical efficacy