肝脏 ›› 2026, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (4): 528-531.

• 肝肿瘤 • 上一篇    下一篇

多模态MRI征象诊断脂肪肝合并局灶性结节性病变的效能

张合意, 理欣然, 刘肖肖   

  1. 466000 周口 周口市中医院放射科(张合意),磁共振(理欣然);
    450003 郑州 河南省人民医院影像科(刘肖肖)
  • 收稿日期:2025-08-30 出版日期:2026-04-30 发布日期:2026-06-04

Study on the application of multimodal MRI findings in the diagnosis of fatty liver with focal nodular lesions

ZHANG He-yi1, LI Xin-ran2, LIU Xiao-xiao3   

  1. 1. Department of Radiology, Zhongkou City Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Zhoukou 466000, China;
    2. Department of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Zhoukou Municipal Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Zhoukou 466000, China;
    3. Department of Imaging, Henan Provincial People′s Hospital, Zhengzhou 450003, China
  • Received:2025-08-30 Online:2026-04-30 Published:2026-06-04

摘要: 目的 比较局灶性结节性增生(FNH)、肝细胞癌(HCC)在MRI质子密度脂肪分数(PDFF)、弥散参数及动态增强灌注特征方面的差异,并探讨其诊断效能。方法 收集2022年12月至2025年9月周口市中医院接受肝脏MRI检查并经病理证实为脂肪肝合并局灶性结节性病变患者92例,其中FNH 55例、HCC 37例。比较FNH、HCC两组脂肪定量参数、弥散参数及动态增强参数,并分析诊断效能。结果 FNH组病灶内及病灶周围肝实质PDFF为(9.3±2.1)%和(18.6±6.2)%,显著低于HCC组的(16.7±2.9)%和(24.9±7.8)%(均P<0.05)。FNH组表观弥散系数(ADC)及纯扩散系数D均显著高于HCC组,为(1.45±0.18)×10-3 mm2/s比(1.12±0.21)×10-3 mm2/s、(1.18±0.14)比(0.89±0.16),均P<0.05;而微灌注分数f显著低于HCC组,为(18.2±4.1)% 比(25.7±5.4)%(P<0.05)。FNH组动脉期增强幅度显著低于HCC组,为(78.6±22.4)%比 (112.3±28.5)%(P<0.05),而门静脉期与延迟期相对强化比更高,为(0.92±0.15)比 (0.68±0.14)、(0.88±0.13)比(0.56±0.12)(均P<0.05)。ROC分析显示ADC、延迟期强化比、洗脱率及强化模式的AUC分别为0.90、0.91、0.93及0.94,多参数联合模型AUC达0.97,灵敏度94.5%,特异度91.9%。结论 多模态MRI能够从脂肪沉积、组织结构、细胞密度和血流灌注多层面有效区分脂肪肝背景下的FNH与HCC,其综合诊断效能显著高于单一参数。

关键词: 脂肪肝, 局灶性结节性增生, 肝细胞癌, 质子密度脂肪分数

Abstract: Objective To compare the differences between focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in terms of MRI proton density fat fraction (PDFF), diffusion parameters, and dynamic contrast-enhanced perfusion characteristics, and to evaluate their diagnostic performance. Methods A total of 92 patients who underwent liver MRI between December 2022 and September 2025 and were pathologically confirmed to have fatty liver with focal nodular lesions were retrospectively enrolled. According to pathological diagnosis, 55 cases were classified as FNH and 37 cases as HCC. Fat quantification parameters, diffusion parameters, and dynamic enhancement characteristics were compared between the two groups, and their diagnostic performance was evaluated. Results In FNH group, the PDFF in the lesion and the surrounding liver parenchyma were significantly lower than those in HCC group [(9.3±2.1)% vs. (16.7±2.9)%, (18.6±6.2)% vs. (24.9±7.8)%, all P<0.05). In terms of diffusion parameters, ADC and pure diffusion coefficient D in FNH group were significantly higher than those in HCC group [(1.45±0.18) × 10-3 mm2/s vs. (1.12±0.21) × 10-3 m2/s; (1.18±0.14) vs. (0.89±0.16), all P<0.05), while the micro-perfusion fraction F was significantly lower than that in HCC group [(18.2±4.1)% vs. (25.7±5.4)%, P<0.05). In the aspect of dynamic enhancement, the enhancement amplitude of FNH group in arterial phase was significantly lower than that of HCC group [(78.6±22.4)% vs. (112.3±28.5)%, P<0.05], while the relative enhancement ratio of portal vein phase and delayed phase was higher [(0.92±0.15) vs. (0.68±0.14), (0.88±0.13) vs. (0.56±0.12), all P<0.05]. ROC analysis showed that the AUC of ADC, enhancement ratio of delay period, elution rate and enhancement mode were 0.90, 0.91, 0.93 and 0.94, respectively, and the AUC of multi-parameter joint model reached 0.97, with sensitivity of 94.5% and specificity of 91.9%. Conclusion Multimodal MRI can effectively distinguish FNH from HCC in the background of fatty liver by assessing fat deposition, tissue structure, cellular density, and perfusion characteristics. Its comprehensive diagnostic performance is significantly superior to any single sequence or parameter.

Key words: Fatty liver, Focal nodular hyperplasia, Hepatocellular carcinoma, Proton density fat fraction