肝脏 ›› 2018, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (11): 977-980.

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

吲哚菁绿对原发性小肝癌患者外科治疗方案选择的影响

陶丹, 严晨丽   

  1. 430000 武汉 华中科技大学同济医学院附属武汉市中心医院肝胆胰外科
  • 收稿日期:2018-05-25 出版日期:2018-11-30 发布日期:2020-04-28
  • 通讯作者: 陶丹,Email:809078608@qq.com

Effect of indocyanine green on the selection of surgical treatment options for primary small hepatocellular carcinoma patients

TAO Dan, YAN Chen-li   

  1. The Central Hospital of Wuhan, Hubeiwuhan 430000, China
  • Received:2018-05-25 Online:2018-11-30 Published:2020-04-28
  • Contact: YAN Chen-li, Email: pvu556593552@163.com

摘要: 目的 探讨吲哚菁绿(ICG)对原发性小肝癌患者外科治疗方案选择的影响。方法 以2015年2月至2018年2月收治的小肝癌患者108例为研究对象,其中行肝切除术治疗者52例(肝切除术组),行RFA治疗者56例(RFA组)。采集患者术前及术后肝功能资料,比较肝衰组和非肝衰组患者的Child-Pugh和ICG-R15。结果 肝切除术组和RFA组性别、年龄、BMI、AST、ALT、TBil、Alb、Child-Pugh和ICG比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);肝切除术组肿瘤最大径为(5.2±2.1)cm显著高于RFA组(2.3±2.0)cm(P<0.05)。肝切除术组和RFA组分别有9例和6例发生肝功能衰竭。肝切除术组和RFA组肝功能衰竭患者Child-Pugh分值和ICG分别为(8.5±1.0)和(31.2±17.5)%、(8.6±1.1)和(38.5±13.5)%,均显著高于同组非肝功能衰竭患者(5.5±0.8)和(13.4±8.6)%、(5.7±0.6)和(14.2±7.5)%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。此外,肝切除术组和RFA组中,肝功能衰竭患者与非肝衰患者ICG-R15分级和肝功能分级比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 肝切除术和RFA治疗小肝癌手术安全性相当,ICG试验对选择肝切除术还是RFA治疗的指导价值有限,但预测术后肝功能衰竭有较高的评估价值。

关键词: 小肝癌, 吲哚菁绿, 肝切除术, 射频消融术

Abstract: Objective To investigate the effect of indocyanine green (ICG) on the choice of surgical treatment for patients with primary small hepatocellular carcinoma. Methods A retrospective analysis of 108 patients with small hepatocellular carcinoma who were treated in our hospital from February 2015 to February 2018 was conducted. Among these patients, 52 patients underwent hepatectomy (hepatectomy group) and 56 patients underwent radiofrequency ablation (RFA) therapy (RFA group). The preoperative and postoperative liver function data were collected and patients were classified into hepatic failure group and non-hepatic failure group according to whether liver failure occurred. Results There was no significant difference in gender, age, body mass index, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, total bilirubin, albumin, Child-Pugh (CP) score and ICG between hepatectomy group and RFA group (P>0.05). The maximum diameter of the tumor in hepatectomy group was significantly higher than that in RFA group (5.2±2.1 cm vs 2.3±2.0 cm, P<0.05). Liver failure occurred in 9 patients and 6 patients in the hepatectomy group and the RFA group, respectively. The CP scores of patients with liver failure were significantly higher than those of patients without liver failure in both hepatectomy and RFA group (8.5±1.0, 8.6±1.1 vs 5.5±0.8, 5.7±0.6, P<0.05). And ICGs were the same (31.2±17.5 %, 38.5±13.5 % vs 13.4±8.6%, 14.2±7.5%, P<0.05). In addition, there were significant differences in the ICG-retention rate at 15 minutes and liver function grading between patients with hepatic failure and non-hepatic failure in hepatectomy and RFA group (P<0.05). Conclusion Hepatectomy and RFA are safe treatment of small hepatocellular carcinoma. The ICG test has limited value in the selection of hepatectomy or RFA, but it has a high evaluation value in predicting postoperative liver failure.

Key words: Small hepatocellular carcinoma, Indocyanine green, Hepatectomy, Radiofrequency ablation