肝脏 ›› 2020, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (5): 498-500.

• 其他肝病 • 上一篇    下一篇

肝脏原发性和转移性神经内分泌肿瘤的超声造影表现对比

王文清   

  1. 274000 山东省菏泽市中医医院超声科
  • 收稿日期:2019-12-08 发布日期:2020-06-08
  • 基金资助:
    山东省科技发展计划(2014GSF118064)

Comparison of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography between primary and metastatic neuroendocrine tumors of the liver

WANG Wen-qing   

  1. Department of Ultrasonography, Heze Hospital of traditional Chinese Medicine,Heze, Shandong 274000
  • Received:2019-12-08 Published:2020-06-08

摘要: 目的 比较肝脏原发性神经内分泌肿瘤(PHNEN)、转移性神经内分泌肿瘤(MHNEN)超声造影表现。方法 回顾性分析2008年1月至2019年7月间菏泽市中医医院收治的肝脏神经内分泌肿瘤患者26例。其中MHNEN患者22例,男性12例,女性10例,年龄(50.6±9.4)岁;PHNEN患者4例,男性2例,女性2例,年龄(53.1±14.2)岁。计量资料以±s表示,用t检验比较;计数资料以百分比表示,用卡方检验比较。结果 22例MHNEN患者肿瘤原发部位包括胰腺(9例)、胃(4例)、胆囊(4例)、小肠(2例)、结直肠(2例)及肺(1例),病灶共发现28个,病灶直径1.5~12.8 cm,平均(4.2±3.6)cm。16个病灶表现为高或稍高回声,12个病灶表现为稍低或低回声;11个病灶边界清楚,14个病灶边界欠清,3个病灶边界不清楚;15个病灶可见血流信号。4例PHNEN患者病灶共发现7个,病灶直径1.8~17.4 cm,平均(7.2±5.5)cm。5个病灶表现为高或稍高回声,2个病灶表现为稍低或低回声;4个病灶边界清楚,2个病灶边界欠清,1个病灶边界不清楚;2个病灶可见血流信号。MHNEN、PHNEN患者病灶直径存在显著差异(P<0.05)。MHNEN、PHNEN患者开始增强时间、开始消退时间、增强持续时间、增强速度、消退速度、增强形式及增强形态差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 MHNEN、PHNEN超声及超声造影表现具有特征性,以整体增强、“快进快退”模式为主,对神经内分泌瘤的诊断具有临床价值,但需要今后进一步比较MHNEN、PHNEN的超声表现差异。

关键词: 肝肿瘤, 神经内分泌肿瘤, 超声造影

Abstract: Objective The contrast-enhanced ultrasonographic findings of primary hepatic neuroendocrine neoplasm (PHNEN) and metastatic neuroendocrine neoplasm (MHNEN) were compared.Methods A retrospective analysis was made of 26 patients with hepatic neuroendocrine neoplasm treated in our hospital from January 2008 to July 2019, including 26 patients with contrast-enhanced ultrasonography. There were 22 patients with MHNEN, 12 males and 10 females, aged (50.6±9.4) years, and 4 patients with PHNEN, including 2 males and 2 females, aged (53.1±14.2) years. The measurement data are expressed as (±s), compared by t-test, the counting data are expressed as percentages, and compared by chi-square test. Results The primary sites of tumors in 22 patients with MHNEN included pancreas (n=9), stomach (n=4), gallbladder (n=4), small intestine (n=2), colon and rectum (n=2) and lung (n=1). A total of 28 lesions were found with a diameter of 1.5×12.8 cm. The average value was (4. 2±3. 6) cm. 16 lesions showed high or slightly high echo, 12 lesions showed slightly low or low echo, 11 lesions had clear boundary, 14 lesions had unclear boundary, 3 lesions had unclear boundary, and 15 lesions had blood flow signal. A total of 7 lesions were found in 4 patients with PHNEN, with a diameter of 1.8 to 17.4 cm, with an average of (7.2±5.5) cm. 5 lesions showed high or slightly high echo, 2 lesions showed slightly low or low echo, 4 lesions had clear boundary, 2 lesions had unclear boundary, 1 lesion had unclear boundary, and 2 lesions had blood flow signal. There was significant difference in lesion diameter between MHNEN and PHNEN patients (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the beginning enhancement time, the beginning regression time, the enhancement duration, the enhancement speed, the regression speed, the enhancement form and the enhancement shape between MHNEN and PHNEN patients (P>0.05).Conclusion MHNEN and PHNEN are characteristic in ultrasonography and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography, mainly in the mode of overall enhancement and 'fast forward and fast retrogression'. They are of clinical value in the diagnosis of neuroendocrine neoplasm, but it is necessary to further compare the differences of ultrasonographic findings between MHNEN and PHNEN in the future.

Key words: Liver neoplasms, Neuroendocrine neoplasm, Contrast-enhanced ultrasonographic