肝脏 ›› 2022, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (6): 668-671.

• 肝纤维化及肝硬化 • 上一篇    下一篇

肝硬化伴与不伴肝源性糖尿病临床表现及预后

李爽旗, 蒙连新, 韦素雨, 王焬圣, 季红运, 吴娜   

  1. 533000 广西百色市 右江民族医学院研究生学院(李爽旗、季红运、吴娜 ),右江民族医学院附属医院(蒙连新、韦素雨);民族卫生学校临床教学一组(王焬圣)
  • 收稿日期:2021-09-10 出版日期:2022-06-30 发布日期:2022-08-04
  • 通讯作者: 蒙连新,Email:1950175775@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    广西百色市科学研究与技术开发计划自筹经费课题(百科20202804);广西壮族自治区卫生健康委员会自筹经费科研课题(桂卫科教发〔2019〕15号,Z20190592)

Differential analysis of clinical manifestation and prognosis between simple cirrhosis and cirrhosis with hepatogenic diabetes

LI Shuang-qi1,2, MENG Lian-xin1, WEI Su-yu2, WANG Xi-sheng3, JI Hong-yun1,2, WU Na1   

  1. 1. Graduate School of Youjiang Medical College for Nationalities, Baise, Guangxi 533000, China;
    2. Affiliated Hospital of Youjiang Medical College for Nationalities, Baise, Guangxi 533000, China;
    3. School of ethnic health clinical teaching group, Baise,Guangxi 533000, China
  • Received:2021-09-10 Online:2022-06-30 Published:2022-08-04
  • Contact: MENG Lian-xin,Email:1950175775@qq.com

摘要: 目的 比较肝硬化伴与不伴肝源性糖尿病(HD)患者的临床表现及预后差异,探讨血糖水平对疾病预后的影响。方法 回顾性分析2019年1月至2020年1月于右江民族医学院附属医院住院的82例肝硬化患者临床资料。其中合并HD组40例,非HD组42例。比较两组患者性别、年龄、住院天数、病程、肝功能分级、BMI指数、实验室指标、并发症的发生、病死率、出院后再入院率的差异。logisitic回归分析并发HD的危险因素。结果 非HD组与HD组年龄、住院天数、病程、肝功能分级比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组患者在性别、 病因、BMI指数 、超敏C反应蛋白、低密度脂蛋白等差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。随访1年,两组死亡人数均为0,非 HD 组再次住院 1 例,HD组再次住院8例。出院后HD组患者肺部感染发生率(35%)与非HD 组(14.28%)相比较差异有统计学意义(χ2=4.767,P=0.029),其他并发症差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。 logistic回归分析结果提示,病程、Child-Pugh分级 C 级是肝硬化合并HD影响因素,不良临床表现的危险因素中合并高血糖占主导地位。结论 非HD组与HD组患者的年龄、住院时间、病程、肝功能均存在差异,病程、Child-Pugh分级 C 级是合并肝源性糖尿病肝硬化的危险因素。

关键词: 肝硬化, 肝源性糖尿病, 临床表现, 预后

Abstract: Objective To compare the clinical manifestations and prognosis of liver cirrhosis patients with simple cirrhosis and those with hepatogenic diabetes (HD), to explore the influence of blood glucose level on the prognosis of the disease, and to summarize the experience of treatment and nursing.Methods The clinical data of 82 patients with hepatic cirrhosis from January 2019 to January 2020 were analyzed retrospectively. Within them, patients with simple cirrhosis were grouped as the control group, and patients combined with hepatogenic diabetes (HD) cirrhosis were grouped as the observation group. They were compared with the differences in sex, age of admission, length of hospital-stay, course of disease, liver function classification, body mass index (BMI) and laboratory indexes, and analyzed the differences in the occurrence of complications, mortality rate and readmission rate after discharge. Logistic regression analysis was applied to identify the risk factors of hepatogenic diabetes mellitus and its adverse clinical manifestations.Results There were significant differences between the admission age, length of stay, course of disease and distribution of liver function of patients with simple cirrhosis and those with HD cirrhosis (P<0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups in sex, etiology, BMI, hypersensitive-C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), Low-density lipoprotein and other clinical indexes (P>0.05). The follow-up time was 1 year and no death happened in both groups. There was 1 re-hospitalized case in control Group and 8 re-hospitalized cases in HD Group. The incidence of pulmonary infection in HD Group (35%) was significantly higher than that in control group (14.28%) (P<0.05). There was no significant difference between these two groups in the incidence of other complications (P>0.05). The Results of Logistic regression analysis showed that the course of disease and Child-Pugh grade C were risk factors of HD complication in liver cirrhosis (P<0.05).Conclusion There were significant differences in admission age, length of stay, course of disease and liver function between simple cirrhosis group and cirrhosis with HD group, the course of disease and the liver function of Child Pugh grade C were risk factors of liver cirrhosis complicated with hepatogenic diabetes. Cirrhotic patients with HD had higher risk of adverse clinical manifestations than those without.

Key words: Cirrhosis, Hepatogenic diabetes, Clinical manifestations, Prognosis