肝脏 ›› 2025, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (10): 1335-1339.

• 肝癌 • 上一篇    下一篇

载药微球经动脉化疗栓塞术联合仑伐替尼、PD-1单抗治疗大肝癌的疗效

刘勇, 李壮, 朱峰   

  1. 211112 南京 南京医科大学附属逸夫医院普外科(刘勇,李壮,朱峰);430014 武汉 武汉市第六医院(江汉大学附属医院)(朱峰)
  • 收稿日期:2025-04-20 出版日期:2025-10-31 发布日期:2025-12-16
  • 通讯作者: 朱峰,Email:Zhufeng@njmu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    南京市卫生科技发展专项资金项目(No:ZKX21020)

The efficacy of drug eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization combined with lenvastinib and PD-1 monoclonal antibody in the treatment of large liver cancer

LIU Yong1, LI Zhuang1, ZHU Feng1,2   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 211112, China;
    2. the Sixth Hospital of Wuhan (Affiliated Hospital of Jianghan University), 430014 Wuhan, China
  • Received:2025-04-20 Online:2025-10-31 Published:2025-12-16
  • Contact: ZHU Feng,Email:Zhufeng@njmu.edu.cn

摘要: 目的 观察载药微球经动脉化疗栓塞术(DEB-TACE)、程序性死亡因子-1(PD-1)联合仑伐替尼治疗大肝癌的疗效。方法 回顾性分析南京医科大学附属逸夫医院2021年7月至2023年1月就诊的大肝癌患者85例的病历资料,根据治疗方法分为对照组(n=42)和观察组(n=43),对照组接受仑伐替尼联合DCB-TACE治疗,观察组在此基础上另给予PD-1单抗治疗。对比2组血清学指标、疗效、肝功能、肿瘤标志物、预后与不良反应。结果 相比于对照组,观察组的客观缓解率、疾病控制率均更高(P<0.05)。观察组治疗后的丙氨酸氨基转移酶(ALT)(38.10±3.12)U/L、甲胎蛋白(AFP)(97.25±11.08)ng/mL、天冬氨酸氨基转移酶(AST)(39.02±3.18)U/L、糖类蛋白199(CA199)(172.03±18.29)U/mL、总胆红素(TBil)(20.13±1.78)μmol/L、α-L-岩藻糖苷酶(AFU)(34.27±4.26)U/L,比对照组低[分别为ALT(43.09±4.37)U/L、(149.20±18.31)ng/mL、(43.19±3.76)U/L、(217.14±22.68)U/mL、(23.07±2.43)μmol/L、(50.06±6.18)U/L](P<0.05)。相比于对照组,观察组的基质金属蛋白酶-9(MMP-9)与血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)更低(P<0.05),且2年存活率更高。2组不良反应总发生率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 DEB-TACE联合仑伐替尼、PD-1单抗治疗大肝癌疗效确切,可降低肿瘤标志物水平,调节VEGF、MMP-9表达,改善肝功能,且安全性良好。

关键词: 仑伐替尼, 程序性死亡因子-1单抗, 大肝癌, 载药微球经动脉化疗栓塞术, 临床疗效, 不良反应

Abstract: Objective To observe the efficacy of drug eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) combined with lenvastinib and programmed death factor-1 (PD-1) monoclonal antibody in the treatment of large liver cancer. Methods The medical records of 85 patients with large liver cancer treated in Sir Run Run Hospital, Nanjing Medical University Hospital from July 2021 to January 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the treatment methods, they were divided into a control group (n=42) and an observation group (n=43). The control group received lenvatinib combined with DCB-TACE treatment. On this basis, the observation group was also given PD-1 monoclonal antibody treatment. The serological indicators, therapeutic effects, liver functions, tumor markers, prognosis and adverse reactions in these two groups of patients were compared. Results Compared with the control group, the objective response rate and disease control rate of the observation group were both higher (P<0.05). In the observation group after treatment, the levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (38.10±3.12) U/L, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) (97.25±11.08) ng/mL, aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (39.02±3.18) U/L, carbohydrate protein 199 (CA199) (172.03±18.29) U/mL, total bilirubin (TBil) (20.13±1.78) μmol/L, and α-L-fucoidase (AFU) (34.27±4.26) U/L were lower than those of (149.20±18.31) ng/mL, (43.19±3.76) U/L, (217.14±22.68) U/mL, (23.07±2.43) μmol/L, (50.06±6.18) U/L in the control group, respectively (P<0.05). Compared with the control group after treatment, the matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in the observation group were lower (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the total incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups (P>0.05). The 2-year survival rate of the observation group was higher when compared with the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion The combination therapies of DEB-TACE with lenvastinib and PD-1 monoclonal antibody has demonstrated definite efficacy in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. It can reduce the levels of serum tumor markers, down-regulate VEGF and MMP-9 expression, improve liver function, and has shown a good safety profile.

Key words: Lenvastinib, Programmed death factor-1 monoclonal antibody, Large liver cancer, Drug eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization, Clinical effect, Adverse reaction