Laennec入路腹腔镜解剖性肝切除与传统经Glisson肝蒂解剖腹腔镜肝切除的效果对比

肝脏 ›› 2025, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (11): 1568-1571.

Laennec入路腹腔镜解剖性肝切除与传统经Glisson肝蒂解剖腹腔镜肝切除的效果对比

王财庆, 方健, 谢冬冬, 徐良明, 余德才

211300 南京南京市高淳人民医院肝胆外科(王财庆,方健,谢冬冬,徐良明);210003 南京南京鼓楼医院肝胆外科(余德才)

收稿日期:2025-02-21 出版日期:2025-11-30 发布日期:2026-02-09
通讯作者: 余德才,Email:yudecai@nju.edu.cn
基金资助:
南京市卫生健康委员会(ZKX22063)

Comparison of the effect of laparoscopic anatomic hepatectomy by Laennec approach and traditional laparoscopic anatomic hepatectomy by Glisson pedicle

WANG Cai-qing¹, FANG Jian¹, XIE Dong-dong¹, XU Liang-ming¹, YU De-cai²

1. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Gaochun People′s Hospital, Nanjing 211300, China;
2. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Gulou Hospital, Nanjing 210003, China

Received:2025-02-21 Online:2025-11-30 Published:2026-02-09
Contact: YU De-cai,Email:yudecai@nju.edu. cn

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的比较Laennec入路腹腔镜解剖性肝切除与传统经Glisson肝蒂解剖腹腔镜肝切除的效果。方法选取97例肝肿瘤、肝胆管结石、肝血管瘤患者进行前瞻性研究,按照随机数字表法分为2组,分别行经Glisson肝蒂(对照组)、Laennec入路(观察组)的腹腔镜解剖性肝切除术。比较两组的手术指标、不良事件发生情况,并统计血清指标(ALT、AST、Alb)。结果观察组手术时间(164.3±31.9)min、肝门阻断时间(51.0±6.1)min、肝周游离时间(15.5±3.7)min、肝蒂分离时间(19.5±4.8)min、肝后分离时间(5.5±1.3)min、肝实质离断时间(41.0±7.2)min、住院时间(10.3±3.1)d,均短于对照组[(196.5±34.8)min、(67.0±5.6)min、(19.0±4.3)min、(24.5±5.4)min、(7.5±2.1)min、(47.0±7.5)min、(13.0±3.4)d],术中出血量(232.4±47.5)mL少于对照组(284.6±52.3)mL,不良事件总发生率(0%)低于对照组(10.0%)、术后血清Alb水平(38.6±5.1)g/L高于对照组(34.2±3.5)g/L,术后血清ALT(276.8±13.1)U/L、AST(253.6±15.4)U/L水平均低于对照组[(315.5±14.2)U/L、(297.6±16.5)U/L](P<0.05)。结论与传统经Glisson肝蒂解剖腹腔镜肝切除相比,Laennec入路手术时间短,更利于肝功能恢复及术后的康复。

关键词: Laennec入路, 腹腔镜解剖性肝切除, Glisson肝蒂, 对比

Abstract: Objective To compare the efficacy of Laennec approach laparoscopic anatomic hepatectomy with traditional Glisson pedicle anatomic laparoscopic hepatectomy. Methods 97 patients with hepatic tumor, hepatolithiasis and hepatic hemangioma were selected for prospective study. Patinets were divided into 2 groups according to random number table method, and underwent laparoscopic ananatomical hepatectomy via Glisson hepatic pedicle and Laennec approach respectively. The surgical indexes and adverse events were compared between the two groups. Serum indexes(ALT,AST,Alb)were analyzed. Results In the observation group, the operation time was(164.3±31.9)min, the hilar occlusion time was(51.0±6.1)min, the perihepatic free time was(15.5±3.7)min, the liver pedicle separation time was(19.5±4.8)min, the posthepatic separation time was(5.5±1.3)min, and the hepatic parenchyma separation time was(41.0±7.2)min and hospitalization time was(10.3±3.1)d,which were shorter than control group[(196.5±34.8)min,(67.0±5.6)min,(19.0±4.3)min,(24.5±5.4)min,(7.5±2.1)min,(47.0±7.5)min,(13.0±3.4)d]. The intraoperative blood loss(232.4±47.5)mL was lower than that of the control group(284.6±52.3)mL. The overall incidence of adverse events(0%) lower than control group (10%), and the postoperative serum Alb level(38.6±5.1)g/L was higher than the control group (34.2±3.5)g/L. The levels of serum ALT(276.8±13.1)U/L and AST(253.6±15.4)U/L were lower than those of control group after operation[(315.5±14.2)U/L,(297.6±16.5)U/L](P<0.05). Conclusion Compared with traditional laparoscopic hepatectomy via Glisson pedicle dissection, Laennec approach is not only shorter in operation time, but also more beneficial to liver function and postoperative rehabilitation.

Key words: Laennec approach, Laparoscopic anatomic hepatectomy, Glisson hepatic pedicle, Compare

王财庆, 方健, 谢冬冬, 徐良明, 余德才. Laennec入路腹腔镜解剖性肝切除与传统经Glisson肝蒂解剖腹腔镜肝切除的效果对比[J]. 肝脏, 2025, 30(11): 1568-1571.

WANG Cai-qing, FANG Jian, XIE Dong-dong, XU Liang-ming, YU De-cai. Comparison of the effect of laparoscopic anatomic hepatectomy by Laennec approach and traditional laparoscopic anatomic hepatectomy by Glisson pedicle[J]. Chinese Hepatolgy, 2025, 30(11): 1568-1571.

/ 推荐

参考文献

[1] Kazami Y, Kaneko J, Keshwani D, et al. Two-step artificial intelligence algorithm for liver segmentation automates anatomic virtual hepatectomy[J]. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci,2023,30(11):1205-1217.
[2] Kawamoto Y, Honda G, Ome Y, et al. Laparoscopic left hepatectomy in a goat as a training model for laparoscopic anatomic liver resection:results of training courses with a total of 70 goats[J]. Surg Endosc,2023,37(5):3634-3641.
[3] Yang Y, Yu CY, Lin F, et al. Application of Laennec extrathecal blockade combined with indocyanine green fluorescence imaging in laparoscopic anatomic hepatectomy[J]. ANZ J Surg,2024,94(4):655-659.
[4] Birgin E, Abdelhadi S, Seyfried S, et al. Robotic or laparoscopic repeat hepatectomy after open hepatectomy:a cohort study[J]. Surg Endosc,2024,38(3):1296-1305.
[5] Zhang Y, Shi N, Zou Y, et al. The characteristics of Laennec′s capsule around the hepatic veins:a histological study based on 71 liver surgical specimens[J]. Ann Gastroenterol Surg,2022,7(2):287-294.
[6] Monden K, Ohno K, Hayashi S, et al. Hepatic vein anatomy related to Laennec′s capsule for liver resection[J]. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci,2023,30(5):551-557.
[7] 张文君,陈晓鹏. Laennec膜及其在腹腔镜肝胆外科手术中的应用[J]. 肝胆胰外科杂志,2024,36(5):257-261,268.
[8] 陈鹏宇,陆礼柏,汪伟,等. Laennec膜理论在腹腔镜肝脏手术中的应用研究进展[J]. 齐齐哈尔医学院学报,2021,42(12):1059-1062.
[9] Qiu D, Zhuang H, Han F. Effect and influence factor analysis of intrahepatic Glisson′s sheath vascular disconnection approach for anatomical hepatectomy by three-dimensional laparoscope[J]. J BUON,2017,22(1):157-161.
[10] Wan H, Xie K, Wu H. Parenchymal sparing Laparoscopic segmentectomy Ⅲ and IV with indocyanine green fluorescence negative stain method using Glisson pedicle approach[J]. J Gastrointest Surg,2023,27(1):203-204.
[11] Zheng K, Liao A, Yan L, et al. Laparoscopic anatomic bi-segmentectomy(S3 and S4b)using the Glisson′s pedicle-first and intrahepatic anatomic markers approach[J]. Surg Endosc,2022,36(10):7859-7860.
[12] Zhang C, Ma J, Zhou Y. Laparoscopic dissection of the first and second porta hepatis along Laennec′s capsule via"hepatic serosal incision"approach:How I do it[J]. World J Surg,2024,48(8):1967-1972.
[13] Hanzawa S, Monden K, Hioki M, et al. How-I-do-it:Laparoscopic left medial sectionectomy utilizing a cranial approach to the middle hepatic vein and Laennec′s capsule[J]. Langenbecks Arch Surg,2021,406(6):2091-2097.
[14] Hu W, Zhang G, Chen M, et al. Laennec′s approach for laparoscopic anatomical hemihepatectomy[J]. World J Surg Oncol,2021,19(1):295.
[15] You N, Wu K, Li Y, et al. Intrahepatic Glisson intrathecal dissection via a hepatic parenchymal transection-first approach for laparoscopic anatomical hemihepatectomy in patients with left/right Glisson pedicle involvement[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A,2024,34(3):257-262.
[16] 李昊楠,王静,李润华,等. 以APR三角为标志的Glisson肝蒂优先入路在腹腔镜解剖性右半肝切除术中的应用[J]. 局解手术学杂志,2024,33(10):854-858.
[17] Shen J, Dai J, Zhang Y, et al. Baseline HBV-DNA load plus AST/ALT ratio predicts prognosis of HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma after hepatectomy:a multicentre study[J]. J Viral Hepat,2021,28(11):1587-1596.
[18] Mitsiev I, Rubio K, Ranvir V P, et al. Combining ALT/AST values with surgical APGAR score improves prediction of major complications after hepatectomy[J]. J Surg Res(Houst),2021,4(4):656-670.
[19] 李雪,潘栋婉,陈影. 术前血清CRP/Alb、CA19-9检测对原发性肝癌切除术后复发的预测价值[J]. 中国血液流变学杂志,2024,34(2):311-315.
[20] Iida H, Tani M, Komeda K, et al. Superiority of CRP-albumin-lymphocyte index(CALLY index)as a non-invasive prognostic biomarker after hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. HPB(Oxford),2022,24(1):101-115.