肝脏 ›› 2025, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (3): 352-355.

• 肝癌 • 上一篇    下一篇

3D肝脏分析软件在复杂型肝细胞癌切除术中的应用

程晓洁, 彭星华, 葛海江, 程海超, 张明, 李智峰   

  1. 056002 河北 邯郸市第一医院普外一科(程晓洁,葛海江),肝胆外一科(彭星华,程海超,李智峰);063000 华北理工大学附属医院急诊科
  • 收稿日期:2023-10-15 出版日期:2025-03-31 发布日期:2025-06-16
  • 通讯作者: 李智峰,Email: 1052410480@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    河北省2025年度医学科学研究课题计划(20251299)

3D liver analysis software in complex hepatocellular liver cancer resection

CHENG Xiao-jie1, PENG Xing-hua2, GE Hai-jiang1, CHENG Hai-chao2, ZHANGMing3, LI Zhi-feng2   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, First Hospital of Handan City, Hebei 056002, China;
    2. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, First Hospital of Handan City, Hebei 056002, China;
    3. Emergency Department of North China University of Science and Technology Affiliated Hospital, Hebei 063000, China
  • Received:2023-10-15 Online:2025-03-31 Published:2025-06-16
  • Contact: LI Zhi-feng, Email:1052410480@qq.com

摘要: 目的 分析3D肝脏分析软件在复杂型肝细胞癌切除术中的应用价值。方法 2020年5月—2023年3月邯郸市第一医院收治的复杂型肝细胞癌患者64例,按照随机数字表法将其分为对照组(n=32)和观察组(n=32)。对照组在术前进行超声检查,观察组在术前通过3D肝脏分析软件进行检查。结果 观察组的手术时间、术中出血量、虚拟肝脏切除量、实际肝脏体积、残余肝脏体积和残余肝脏体积的标准比率分别为(311.2±72.5)min、(310.2±128.6)mL、(993.6±211.3)mL、(981.2±206.5)mL、(689.5±81.6)mL、(46.5±7.6)%,均优于对照组[分别为(352.9±85.6)min、(406.8±225.6)mL、(1171.5±245.6)mL、(1141.6±216.5)mL、(625.6±58.9)mL、(41.2±6.5)%,P<0.05];观察组甲胎蛋白、天冬氨酸氨基转移酶、丙氨酸氨基转移酶和胆红素水平分别为[(116.5±7.8)ng/mL、(22.8±8.6)IU/L、(30.65±4.6)IU/L、(6.8±2.9)μmol/L]均优于对照组[分别为(215.3±6.1)ng/mL、(35.2±11.5)IU/L、(34.62±5.3)IU/L、(13.1±2.4)μmol/L,P<0.05];术后1~6个月观察组日常生活能力量表(ADL)评分为86.8±2.9,显著高于对照组(61.1±2.4,P<0.05);观察组出血、感染、胆瘘、肝功能衰竭等并发症总发生率为(9.4%),明显低于对照组(56.3%,P<0.05)。结论 将3D肝脏分析软件应用于复杂的肝细胞切除术,不仅可以优化手术和临床指标,还可以减少并发症,提高患者的日常生存率,值得在临床上应用。

关键词: 3D肝脏分析软件, 复杂型, 肝细胞癌, 切除术

Abstract: Objective To analyze the value of 3D liver analysis software in complex hepatocellular cancer resection.Methods 64 patients with hepatocellular cancer admitted to our hospital between May 2020 and March 2023 were divided into a control group (n=32) and an observation group (n=32) according to the random number table method. The control group was examined preoperatively by ultrasound and the observation group was examined preoperatively using 3D liver analysis software.Results Operating time, intraoperative bleeding, virtual liver resection volume, actual resected liver volume, residual liver volume, and standard residual liver volume in the observation group [(311.2±72.5) min, (310.2±128.6) mL, (993.6±211.3) mL, (981.2±206.5) mL, (689.5±81.6) mL, (46.5± (7.6) %] were better than those in the control group [(352.9±85.6) min, (406.8±225.6) mL, (1171.5±245.6) mL, (1141.6±216.5) mL, (625.6±58.9) mL, (41.2±6.5) %, P<0.05]. The levels of methemoglobin, glutathione, ghrelin and bilirubin in the observation group [(116.5±7.8) ng/mL, (22.8±8.6) IU/L, (30.65±4.6) IU/L, (6.8±2.9) μmol/L] were better than those in the control group [(215.3±6.1) ng/mL, (35.2±11.5) IU/L, (34.62±5.3) IU/L, (13.1±2.4) μmol/L, P<0.05]. The ability of daily living (ADL) score of the observation group at 1-6 months after surgery was 86.8 ± 2.9, significantly higher than that of the control group [(61.1±2.4), P<0.05]. The overall incidence of complications such as bleeding, infection, biliary fistula and liver failure in the observation group (9.4%) was significantly lower than that in the control group [(56.3%), P<0.05].Conclusion Applying 3D liver analysis software to complex hepatocyte resection not only optimizes surgical and clinical indices, but also reduces complications and improves daily survival of patients, which is worthy of clinical application.

Key words: 3D Liver analysis software, Complex type, Hepatocellular liver cancer, Resection