肝脏 ›› 2025, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (6): 837-840.

• 其他肝病 • 上一篇    下一篇

非病毒性慢性肝损伤病因分析及诊断路径探讨

冯彦菲, 苏明华, 殷倩冰, 黎清梅, 苏土梅, 江建宁   

  1. 530021 南宁 广西医科大学第一附属医院感染性疾病科(冯彦菲,苏明华,殷倩冰,黎清梅,苏土梅,江建宁);区域性高发肿瘤早期防治研究教育部重点实验室(广西医科大学),广西区域性高发肿瘤早期防治研究重点实验室(江建宁)
  • 收稿日期:2024-10-09 出版日期:2025-06-30 发布日期:2025-08-08
  • 通讯作者: 江建宁,Email:jjianning@ 163. com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目( 82160123,82260124);广西区域性高发肿瘤早期防治研究重点实验室自主课题(GKE-ZZ202218);广西科技基地和人才专项资助(桂科AD25069077)

Diagnostic path and etiology of non-viral chronic liver injury

FENG Yan-fei1, SU Ming-hua1, YIN Qian-bing1, LI Qing-mei1, SU Tu-mei1, JIANG Jian-ning1,2   

  1. 1. Department of Infectious Diseases, First Affiliated Hospital, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning 530021, China;
    2. Key Laboratory of Early Prevention and Treatment for Regional High Frequency Tumor (Guangxi Medical University), Ministry of Education, Guangxi Key Laboratory of Early Prevention and Treatment for Regional High Frequency Tumor, Nanning 530021, China
  • Received:2024-10-09 Online:2025-06-30 Published:2025-08-08
  • Contact: JIANG Jian-ning, Email:jjianning@163.com

摘要: 目的 探讨非病毒性慢性肝损伤的病因和临床诊断路径。方法 回顾性分析2020年6月至2022年12月在广西医科大学第一附属医院收治的非病毒性慢性肝损伤患者356例,对其病因和主要诊断方法进行分析。结果 356例患者中,病因为自身免疫性肝病(AILD )71例(19.9%),非酒精性脂肪性肝病(NAFLD) 64例(18.0%),酒精性肝病(ALD)57例(16.0%);主要诊断方式为病史(26.5%)、肝脏穿刺活检(25.5%)、影像学检查(15.5%)。结合疾病常见类型、实际临床工作中检查的可操作性,总结出以下临床诊断路径:一线筛查:①病史采集及查体;②肝功能;③嗜肝及非嗜肝病毒筛查;④自身免疫抗体;⑤免疫球蛋白;⑥血脂;⑦腹部超声检查。二线筛查:①罕见病原学;②甲状腺功能;③血铜蓝蛋白及K-F环;④肝脏CT/MRI。三线筛查:①基因检测;②肝脏穿刺活检。对于二线或三线筛查意愿不强烈的患者,可以先随访,观察停服特殊药物、戒酒、控制饮食、驱虫或治疗原发病后肝功能是否好转,如若好转,则与上述情况相关。结论 非病毒性慢性肝损伤常见病因为AILD、NAFLD、ALD;非病毒性慢性肝损伤诊断路径图简便易行,值得临床推广试行。

关键词: 非病毒性慢性肝损伤, 病因, 诊断路径

Abstract: Objective To analyze the etiology and diagnostic methods of non-viral chronic liver injury and explore the clinical diagnostic pathways. Methods Clinical data of 356 patients with non-viral chronic liver injury admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University from June 2020 to December 2022 were collected in this study. Results The common causes of non-viral chronic liver injury were autoimmune liver disease (AILD) in 71 cases (19.9%), non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) in 64 cases (18.0%), and alcoholic liver disease (ALD) in 57 cases (16.0%); the main diagnostic methods were medical history (26.5%), liver biopsy (25.5%), and imaging examinations (15.5%). Based on the common types of diseases and the operability of examination, the following clinical diagnosis path were summarized: first-line screening: ① medical history collection and physical examination; ② liver function; ③ liver tropic and non-liver tropic virus screening; ④ autoimmune antibody; ⑤ immunoglobulin; ⑥ blood lipid; ⑦ abdominal ultrasound; second-line screening: ① rare etiology; ② thyroid function; ③ blood ceruloplasmin and K-F ring; ④ liver CT / MRI; third-line screening: ① genetic test; ② liver biopsy. For patients with weak second-line or third-line screening intention, we can follow up first and observe whether the liver function can be improved after taking special drugs, drinking abstinence, diet control, deworming or treatment of the primary disease. If improved, it will be related to the above situation. Conclusion AILD, NAFLD and ALD are common causes of non-viral chronic liver injury. The diagnostic pathway for non-viral chronic liver injury shows high diagnostic efficacy, is simple to implement, and is worthy of clinical promotion on a trial basis.

Key words: Non-viral chronic liver injury, Etiology, Diagnostic path